Re: A CHALLENGE
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:03:21 GMT
<vergon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159147998.111510.20820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|I hereby issue a challenge to all you gents who keep telling me
| how dumb I am --- let's see you solve this problem (as I have).
|
| First, we use as the mass of the photon, Einstein's version: m = L/c^2
| (If you insist the photon has no mass, you are hereby excused --- go
| somewhere else.)
HAHAHA! That PROVES you are a dumb ***.
The photon has no mass.
|
| THE PROBLEM
|
| We have m_1, the mass of a photon ---
So you assume what you intend to prove. That's as fucking dumb
as it gets, you wanker. But ok, m_1 = 0.
| and we have m_2, the mass of a ponderous particle.
Ok, m_2 = 1
|
| m_1 = m_2
0 = 1
Fucking idiot.
|
| We now want to equate the kinetic energy of the photon to that of the
| particle.
h(nu) = mc^2
|
| To restate: At what velocity will the kinetic energy of the particle
| (E_k) equal
| the kinetic energy of the photon?
Don't fuckin' ask questions, get on and prove how dumb you are.
|
| Use a 1 MeV photon --- and an electron as the particle.
<yawn>
|
| NOTE: Not fair to gerrymander the result.
|
| A METHOD MUST BE SHOWN FOR ANY PAIR OF MASSES.
|
| (On second thought, this may be easier than I had supposed.)
It sure was. You proved how dumb you are, knuckle-dragging Neanderthal.
Androcles
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A CHALLENGE
- From: vergon
- Re: A CHALLENGE
- References:
- A CHALLENGE
- From: vergon
- A CHALLENGE
- Prev by Date: Re: Classical and modern physics
- Next by Date: Re: A CHALLENGE
- Previous by thread: Re: A CHALLENGE
- Next by thread: Re: A CHALLENGE
- Index(es):