Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.


"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159194413.299669.253460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:ef8hdi$t2d$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Henri Wilson wrote:
| > | > Geesey, Maxwell's equations produce a value for the universal
constant
| > | > c...which also happens to be the speed of EM wrt its source (for
reasons
| > as yet
| > | > unknown)
| > | >
| > | > Maxwell's equations say absolutely nothing about the speed of EM
from a
| > | > relatively moving source.
| > |
| > | Changing Maxwell's equations by kicking and screaming, Henri? :-)
| > |
| > | Paul
| >
| > Maxwell's equations say absolutely nothing about the speed of EM from a
| > relatively moving source no matter how you drag your knuckles on the
| > ground, Neanderthal Viking.
|
| Sure, they do.

No they don't, Phuckwit Duck. Faraday left it out. Gauss left it out.
Ampere put something in for media such as glass. Maxwell copied.
There is no aether, shithead. You lose (again).
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/AC.htm

Androcles

Androcles.


.

Quantcast