Re: A CHALLENGE
- From: vergon@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 25 Sep 2006 08:35:24 -0700
<vergon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159147998.111510.20820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, the dummies and the crude have had their say --- which was
absolutely worthless
So you can't say I was bluffing, I present here the answer -- which I
bet you don't even understand the question let alone the answer, even
when given to you. That's how dumb you actually are.
The core of the endeavor to reconcile the kinetic energy of an
electromagnetic particle with the corresponding kinetic energy of a
ponderous particle is the correlation of the velocity c of the former
with the sub c velocity of the latter.
To restate: Both particles have the same kinetic energy and the same
mass. The question is, what is the velocity of the ponderous particle?
-------------------------------------------------------------
(h nu = energy of photon = n(m_q) c^2 --- where n = number of
oscillations and m_q the mass of each oscillation
--- 7.3720385 x 10^-48 gram.)
n(m_q) = mass of the photon.
(m = mass of the ponderous particle. R = Lorentz transform)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Seeking a bridge, we write,
1
h nu = n(m_q) c^2 = mc^2 (--- - 1)
R
The crux lies in the second and third terms (K_e = K_e) which we write
1
(nm_q)c^2 = mc^2 (--- - 1)
R
Where nm_q = m_ph , mass of the photon:
1
m_ph c^2 = mc^2 (--- - 1)
R
The c^2,s cancel. We then have:
1
m_ph = m (--- - 1)
R
1
Thus if m_ph = m, then (--- - 1) must be equal to 1
R
to maintain the equality.
If R = .5 this requirement is met. A velocity of .8660254 c or
sqrt(.75) c has the requisite R of .5
Therefore, by utilization of nm_q we conclude that (for example) a
photon of frequency 1.23561 x 10^20 has a mass equal to that of the
electron and both will have the same kinetic energy when the velocity
of the electron is sqrt(.75) c.
To restate the case for clarity:
If a photon (velocity c) were to suddenly transform into a particle
of identical mass it would, in obeying the conservation of kinetic
energy, have a velocity of .8660254 c
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A CHALLENGE
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: A CHALLENGE
- References:
- A CHALLENGE
- From: vergon
- Re: A CHALLENGE
- From: Sorcerer
- A CHALLENGE
- Prev by Date: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- Next by Date: "money honestly"
- Previous by thread: Re: A CHALLENGE
- Next by thread: Re: A CHALLENGE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|