Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- From: "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:57:00 +0200
Henri Wilson wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:17:53 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:Geesey, Maxwell's equations produce a value for the universal constantChanging Maxwell's equations by kicking and screaming, Henri? :-)
c...which also happens to be the speed of EM wrt its source (for reasons as yet
unknown)
Maxwell's equations say absolutely nothing about the speed of EM from a
relatively moving source.
Maxwell's equations apply to light moving in a hypothetical 'aether' ,....which
also provides a rest frame for speed reference.
Does that mean that since the technology based on Maxwell's
equations actually works (or you wouldn't read this),
the existence of the ether is proven?
Maxwell would probably answer "yes".
Would he be right?
Paul
.
- References:
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- Prev by Date: Re: A CHALLENGE
- Next by Date: Aren't they downside up?
- Previous by thread: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- Next by thread: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|