Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- From: rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Sep 2006 12:50:24 -0700
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"ajay2244" <ajay2244.2er5w6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:ajay2244.2er5w6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Can a critic of book
100 Years of E=mc2
be without NAME , PLACE and IDENTITY ?
100 Years of E =mc2
For details
http://tinyurl.com/hbnv9
Contents of outer cover page of book, 100 Years of E =mc2
"""The subject matter discussed in the book has been presented by
author in international conferences in
USA, and ENGALND in 2005-06. In past 5 years this work has accepted
for
presentation over 55 international conferences all over the world. In
addition to this work is published in peer review international
journals.
The theme of work Einstein derivation of E=mc2 as given by in his Sep.
1905 is inadequate, and more generalized equation ; ∆E =
Ac2∆m '""
There is some who is critic and put many posts but without NAME, PLACE
and IDENTITY.
Can a person be without NAME, PLACE and IDENTITY?
In numerous post this UNKNOWN applied 11th Class Law of Conservation of
Momentum incorrectly, to criticize the paper. But later on, after
numerous posts he/she realized.
The link of this UNKNOWN is
http://tinyurl.com/qzkfw
"an a person be without NAME, PLACE and IDENTITY?"
Sure, just like you are a person with a multitude of identities.
In your headers I have counted a dozen of different from-fields
and ditto email addresses.
By the way, from the way you post and from what you post,
it is clear that you show every symptom of full blown schizophrenic
paranoia. You might consider seeking professional help.
Dirk Vdm
Right on, Dirk
This wacko thinks he's found an error in a very old Einstein paper. The
error is, of course, in the shitty derivation that Ajay Sharma slathers
over 28 pages.
When the error has been exposed, the cretin persists.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- From: AJAY SHARMA
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- References:
- 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- From: ajay2244
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Aren't they downside up?
- Next by Date: Re: Aren't they downside up?
- Previous by thread: Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- Next by thread: Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
- Index(es):