sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Erot
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Erot
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: harry
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: harry
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: harry
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: harry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: HAMMOND VS EICKMEIER
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: sal
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: sal
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: sal
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Apples
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Apples
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Apples
  • From: Barry
• Re: Apples
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Apples
  • From: Androcles
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: sal
• Re: Apples
  • From: Barry
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Apples
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: harry
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: Apples
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Apples
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Hund's Law, Superconductivity and the Exclusion Principle
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Apples
  • From: Barry
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Velikovsky/Neocatastrophism Sources
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Erot
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Sue...
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Sue...
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: sal
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: Hund's Law, Superconductivity and the Exclusion Principle
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: HAMMOND VS EICKMEIER
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Tuota
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: wugi
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: D
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sean McIlroy
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inertia : Inert In Activity (?)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Inertia : Inert In Activity (?)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: /\ The Quantum Pyramid /\
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Androcles
• /\ The Quantum Pyramid /\
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Inertia : Inert In Activity (?)
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: wugi
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Tuota
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: yet another paradox (?)
  • From: Androcles
• yet another paradox (?)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Barry
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Noam Chomsky
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: sal
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Noam Chomsky
  • From: Barry
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: shuba
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Androcles
• BH vs BB
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: yangsh03@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: harry
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: xxein
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is the Reality We percieve Engineered / Created / Controlled / Managed?
  • From: Jon-Paul
• Re: Is the Reality We percieve Engineered / Created / Controlled / Managed?
  • From: Jon-Paul
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: wugi
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Problem for ASSistant Professor Tusselad -errata correction, .JPG, not .JPB
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: harry
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein the first to derive E=mc^2 ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: PD
• Re: MASS OF THE PHOTON AND EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Problem for ASSistant Professor Tusselad
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Tuota
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: D
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Was Einstein the first to derive E=mc^2 ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein the first to derive E=mc^2 ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Is the Reality We percieve Engineered / Created / Controlled / Managed?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Was Einstein the first to derive E=mc^2 ?
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: wugi
• Is the Reality We percieve Engineered / Created / Controlled / Managed?
  • From: barabas
• Is the Reality We percieve Engineered / Created / Controlled / Managed?
  • From: barabas
• Re: Was Einstein the first to derive E=mc^2 ?
  • From: harry
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: harry
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• question (length contraction)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: physics?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Was Einstein the first to derive E=mc^2 ?
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Quantum spacetime
  • From: Barry
• Re: physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physics?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: padremo
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Civility
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: harry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: physics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: physics?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: physics?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Darkness travels faster than light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: Civility
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: sal
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: physics?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: padremo
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: sal
• Re: Sound and Science
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: physics?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: sal
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Civility
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Darkness travels faster than light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Traveling faster than light
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: harry
• Re: Civility
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Civility
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Civility
  • From: harry
• Re: Darkness travels faster than light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Traveling faster than light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Civility
  • From: maxwell
• Traveling faster than light
  • From: v4vijayakumar
• Darkness travels faster than light
  • From: v4vijayakumar
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: v4vijayakumar
• Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment, = Total Silence?,...
  • From: Werx
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: sal
• Re: physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: physics?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• The Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• physics?
  • From: xxein
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: GEORGE HAMMOND'S REALITY Part 2
  • From: TMG
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Hcet
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: robert
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: sal
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Geese Gets First Job... Dinky's Guide Dog.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: CURVATURE OF "SUBJECTIVE" SPACETIME
  • From: TMG
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: large scale overunity
  • From: gdewilde
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: The freefall WTC 7 implies its controlled demolition
  • From: malibu
• Re: The freefall WTC 7 implies its controlled demolition
  • From: malibu
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the need for the ether?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: large scale overunity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: robert
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: robert
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: large scale overunity
  • From: gdewilde
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: D
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: sal
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: sal
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: sal
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: another paradox?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: large scale overunity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What's boggling us?
  • From: phyx
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• another paradox?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the need for the ether?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: robert
• Re: mass increase due to speed
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• mass increase due to speed
  • From: robert
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is the need for the ether?
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• large scale overunity
  • From: gdewilde
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the need for the ether?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Straight line?
  • From: will1
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: sal
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: sal
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic?
  • From: athanatos
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Igor
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• What is the need for the ether?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Hcet
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: PD
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: harry
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: sal
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: PD
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: The Speed of Light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: harry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tim BandTechnology
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• The Speed of Light
  • From: Gary Edstrom
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Hcet
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: harry
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: ben carr
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: nature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mechanical linkage and relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: CURVATURE OF "SUBJECTIVE" SPACETIME
  • From: TMG
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Planetray precession in flat space
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: shuba
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: sal
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: PD
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: sal
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: sal
• Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Mechanical linkage and relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Mechanical linkage and relativity?
  • From: micromoog
• Re: Mechanical linkage and relativity?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: sal
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: sal
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tim BandTechnology
• Re: Mechanical linkage and relativity?
  • From: harry
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Mechanical linkage and relativity?
  • From: micromoog
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: nature
  • From: Tim BandTechnology
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tim BandTechnology
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: harry
• "Gravity"
  • From: Hcet
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why electron has three kinds of energy ?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: harry
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: harry
• Re: length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: harry
• length contraction + closed space paradox?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why electron has three kinds of energy ?
  • From: Researcher
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why electron has three kinds of energy ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is a spall?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: nature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Sorcerer
• What is a spall?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Physics
  • From: xxein
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Tim BandTechnology
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Nico
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: sal
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Mike
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: ganymede . jupiter
• Re: nature
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Why electron has three kinds of energy ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: harry
• nature
  • From: Williams
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: harry
• Physics
  • From: musardo@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: sal
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: sal
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Hcet
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: harry
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Why electron has three kinds of energy ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: xxein
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Negative Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: shuba
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ABOUT A NEW MORE GENERAL TRANSFORMATION
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: ABOUT A NEW MORE GENERAL TRANSFORMATION
  • From: sal
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Igor
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: shuba
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Hcet
• one way light speed anisotropy experiment
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: RP
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Negative Mass (was: Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Negative Mass (was: Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light)
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution - a response from Stephen Crothers.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Negative Mass (was: Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: ABOUT A NEW MORE GENERAL TRANSFORMATION
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: ABOUT A NEW MORE GENERAL TRANSFORMATION
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• ABOUT A NEW MORE GENERAL TRANSFORMATION
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
  • From: TrekJunky
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Igor
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Igor
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Igor
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Syad
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: RP
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: RP
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: RP
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: RP
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: RP
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: shuba
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: jem
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: RP
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: PD
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: RP
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Magnetic fields doing work?? No way ... but...
  • From: sal
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: PD
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Phil
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: PD
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: PD
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Phil
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• johnreed take 1A --- modified October 13, 2006
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• The relatvisitic computer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Jerry
• Re: c with the value of +-300000 km/s is the physically infinite value for speed.
  • From: rdrabek
• Re: TWO FATALITIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Syad
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: yen, ka-in
• OT:The two most beautiful and sexy ladies in the world are on QVC
  • From: QVCFan
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: xxein
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Postulates
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: harry
• !!!!!!!!!???????!!!!!!!!!.......... ...
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Postulates
  • From: Douglas Rudd
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: harry
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: vern
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: RP
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Phil
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Phil
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: vern
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Phil
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: energy momentum four vector
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: 10 questions Special Relativity can't possibly answer
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: energy momentum four vector
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• energy momentum four vector
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Syad
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: harry
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: harry
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: harry
• Re: book recommendation about string theory and extra dimensions
  • From: joelsommers.nm@
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• The Mechanics of an invisible ether.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: US Constirution
  • From: dej4
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Phil
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Quark and Gluon seperation
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Postulates
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Hund's Law, Superconductivity and the Exclusion Principle
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: CMBR: How measure CMBR to 4 figures, W/L is only 1 mm
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ac"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Phil
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why quantization?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: book recommendation about string theory and extra dimensions
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: harry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: harry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: harry
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: harry
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: book recommendation about string theory and extra dimensions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Artificial Mind - Part One - Basic Architecture and Cognitive Structure 1st Edition is now available (free download for Evaluation Edition)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Sorcerer
• ac"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Syad
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: harry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• book recommendation about string theory and extra dimensions
  • From: kajlina
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: dej4
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Postulates
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why quantization?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Barry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why quantization?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: yen, ka-in
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Phil
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: xxein
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: dlzc
• Why quantization?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Mike
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Phil
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Barry
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: 10 questions Special Relativity can't possibly answer
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: dlzc
• CMBR: How measure CMBR to 4 figures, W/L is only 1 mm
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time contraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Phil
• Re: Postulates
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: PD
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Time contraction
  • From: topaiva
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: rebwar
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: harry
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: harry
• Re: If Eric Geese ever gets a physics degree I will hand all of mine back.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Phil
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: gregegan
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: jan . bielawski
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Hund's Law, Superconductivity and the Exclusion Principle
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: [Humor] 10 questions Special Relativity can't possibly answer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Postulates
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Postulates
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Postulates
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Postulates
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Postulates
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Postulates
  • From: Douglas Rudd
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Barry
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Mike
• Re: EXPLAINING GOD TO DUMMYS
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Mimicking an event horizon in flat spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Pete
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Tiderc
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Question (faster than light)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: EXPLAINING GOD TO DUMMYS
  • From: TMG
• Question (faster than light)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar
  • From: xxein
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: shuba
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: zzbunker@netscape.net , did Einstein got second Noble Prize in 1941 , as you claim. Can you give some reference.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• zzbunker@netscape.net , did Einstein got second Noble Prize in 1941 , as you claim. Can you give some reference.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: jambaugh
• The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: John Park
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: vergon
• Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: vergon
• Re: US charges the google group and rambus2005
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: xxein
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar
  • From: xxein
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is Einstein's E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is Einstein’s E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: vergon
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: valeri
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: vergon
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: vergon
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: vergon
• Question about the Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Is Einstein’s E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Is Einstein’s E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Is Einstein’s E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Is Einstein's E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is Einstein's E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is Einstein's E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is Einstein's E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Is Einstein’s E=mc2, CONCEPTUALLY applicable for energy emitted Chemical Reactions.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Zoe
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Tiderc
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Look what the cat dragged in from "Progress in Physics"
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: xxein
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: valeri
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: valeri
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Russell
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Igor
• Re: US Constirution
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Igor
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Igor
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: harry
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: shuba
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: dockiers
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OPEN LETTER
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: US Constirution
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: US Constirution
  • From: Sue...
• Answer from google group
  • From: valeri
• Re: US Constirution
  • From: xxein
• OPEN LETTER
  • From: valeri
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: valeri
• Re: You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: valeri
• US Constirution
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: xxein
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Look what the cat dragged in from "Progress in Physics"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Look what the cat dragged in from "Progress in Physics"
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Russell
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Igor
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Barry
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE GRAVITATION MASS.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Absolute Coordinate System
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: SR false?
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Simple Charge Couple
  • From: Sorcerer
• Simple Charge Couple
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Phil
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE GRAVITATION MASS.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: xray4abc
• You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Gravity"
  • From: Tiderc
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: rpasken@eas.slu.edu , you have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Quantization of Time and The Fat Electron
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Did Einstein ever consider free-fall accelerated motion?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• THE GENERAL RELATIVITY.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: vergon
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Pete
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• rpasken@eas.slu.edu , you have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: SR false?
  • From: harry
• Re: SR false?
  • From: harry
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Pete
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: vergon
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Admini
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: US charges the google group and rambus2005
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Euclidean Myth.
  • From: Igor
• Re: US charges the google group and rambus2005
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even a crank like Valeri Dvoeglazov get published
  • From: valeri
• Re: Even a crank like Valeri Dvoeglazov get published
  • From: valeri
• Re: Even a crank like Valeri Dvoeglazov get published
  • From: valeri
• Re: Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: valeri
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: US charges the google group and rambus2005
  • From: valeri
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: US charges the google group and rambus2005
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Space fact GR can't explain
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• The Relativistic Myth.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• US charges the google group and rambus2005
  • From: valeri
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: ADDENDUM TO "A CHALLENGE" RE MISSING MASS
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: PD
• COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
  • From: vergon
• "Aspin Bubbles" has been published.
  • From: Yoël Lana-Renault
• Re: ADDENDUM TO "A CHALLENGE" RE MISSING MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "Aspin Bubbles" has been published.
  • From: Yoël Lana-Renault
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Admini
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Admini
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planc
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: shuba
• Re: Space fact GR can't explain
  • From: fellowgoodnice
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: vergon
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Pete
• Re: Interesting Claim
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space fact GR can't explain
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Interesting Claim
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Admini
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: dockiers
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Space fact GR can't explain
  • From: fellowgoodnice
• Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Admini
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: ADDENDUM TO "A CHALLENGE" RE MISSING MASS
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: RP
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• The true name of rambus (KGB)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: ADDENDUM TO "A CHALLENGE" RE MISSING MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: mapped the disc around a star more massive than the Sun
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: mapped the disc around a star more massive than the Sun
  • From: Dac
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Phil
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: shuba
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?
  • From: dockiers
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Phil
• Re: Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Phil
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Pete
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light - PS
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Absolute Simultaneity and the Speed of Light
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: rambus2005
• Curvature vs. Acclerations in flat space time.
  • From: Phil
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ADDENDUM TO "A CHALLENGE" RE MISSING MASS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE GRAVITATION MASS.
  • From: Igor
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE GRAVITATION MASS.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: ADDENDUM TO "A CHALLENGE" RE MISSING MASS
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Wako wacko , rambus2005@yahoo.com, illfated Nameless.You wre thrashed as Inpain of CERN from WRAP Relativity Forum, so NAME LESS , PLACELESS here. Shame Shame
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• WHAT IS YOUR IDENITY ? COWARD ! TELL WORLD? WHO WILL FOR INDENTYTLESS person.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Igor
• Re: ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE GRAVITATION MASS.
  • From: Igor
• ADDENDUM TO "A CHALLENGE" RE MISSING MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• WHAT IS YOUR IDENITY ? COWARD ! TELL WORLD? WHO WILL FOR INDENTYTLESS person.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review publication system and misuse of Name of CERN in News Groups. BY Dr Alexander Inpain ( he claims he is in CERN), Email rambus2005@yahoo.com
  • From: rambus2005
• WHAT IS YOUR IDENITY ? COWARD ! TELL WORLD? WHO WILL FOR INDENTYTLESS person.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review publication system and misuse of Name of CERN in News Groups. BY Dr Alexander Inpain ( he claims he is in CERN), Email rambus2005@yahoo.com
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Have you any name ? Have your father have any bame ? Who cares for indentityless persons?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Have you any name ? Have your father have any bame ? Who cares for indentityless persons?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: harry
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE FIELD, THE PARTICLES AND THE DEATH OF PHYSICS
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: mapped the disc around a star more massive than the Sun
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE BIBLE, fact or fiction
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: count zero
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: Sue...
• mapped the disc around a star more massive than the Sun
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: count zero
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: count zero
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Gross violation of Scientific Ethics, abuse to Peer Review publication system and misuse of Name of CERN in News Groups. BY Dr Alexander Inpain ( he claims he is in CERN), Email rambus2005@yahoo.com
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Phil
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: A very persistent moronic spammer - Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A very persistent moronic spammer - Ajay Sharma
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: rambus2005
• Can some tell the name of, Nameless, Placeless, COWARD rambus2005@yahoo.com ?More than 100 times I asked him to put value of phi 89 dgeree , then his eq.(1.5) and my papers lead to SAME RESULTS.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Ill fated , rambus2005@yahoo.com Have you any any NAME ? Tell world what is your father's name and identity ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Have you any name ? Have your father have any bame ? Who cares for indentityless persons?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Have you any name ? Have your father have any bame ? Who cares for indentityless persons?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Ill fated , rambus2005@yahoo.com Have you any any NAME ? Tell world what is your father's name and identity ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Electron Binding Energy Equation completed
  • From: David Thomson
• Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE GRAVITATION MASS.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...