Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: "LEJ Brouwer" <intuitionist1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Oct 2006 01:46:34 -0700
badd_xi2@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Excuse me. I'm more use to conversing with physicists. Physicists
typically try to classify things in groups defined by similarities
and differences.
My two year old can do that. Are you quite sure you weren't conversing
with a bunch of toddlers?
If nothing else, it should have been obvious that
if a neutrino were exactly like an electron, it would be an electron
as there would be nothing to distinguish it from an electron.
Your mastery of advanced logic is absolutely stupefying.
Why
are you attempting to overthrow physics without knowing anything
about what you intend to overthrow?
I have a PhD in theoretical physics from MIT.
.
- References:
- Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: badd_xi2
- Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- From: badd_xi2
- Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- Prev by Date: Re: New Look on Relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
- Previous by thread: Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- Next by thread: Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- Index(es):