OPEN LETTER

From: valeri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 3 Oct 2006 18:42:08 -0700

Unfortunately, the google group answer to my previous OPEN LETTER was
uncomprehensible (see other topics). Again, I am going to prosecute the
user rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx (and the known US Company) in the US Court.
So, I repeat my request to google group Administration to provide the
IP address of the above-mentioned user, and to write some more
comprehensible answer. Of course, you understand that the US judge
would NOT be favourble to such sort of answers as I received from you.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OPEN LETTER
  - From: FrediFizzx
- Re: OPEN LETTER
  - From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: OPEN LETTER
  - From: karandash2000
- Re: OPEN LETTER
  - From: Eric Gisse
- Answer from google group
  - From: valeri

Prev by Date: Re: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
Next by Date: Re: US Constirution
Previous by thread: US Constirution
Next by thread: Answer from google group
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Model Rail - Gem Kit
... looks like Google group issue of some sort. ... OK - I checked using Thunderbird, ... possibly the default character set for incoming mail and news - ...
(uk.rec.models.rail)
Google Groups replies (was Re: About writing SF)
... listed it as a Google Group or something of the sort. ... up a small committee to explain We're not a Google Group; ... using Google Groups does now quote the text you are replying to. ...
(rec.arts.sf.written)