Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil


cafeinst@xxxxxxx wrote:
Has anyone read this paper?

http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-10.PDF

It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove
that there is no absolute continuum. Any comments about it? It seems to
me to be very surprising. His argument is not very complicated; I'd
like to hear the opinions of the experts on this.

Thank you,
Craig

1. Published in "Regress in Physics"?
+
2. "Doppler Effect" when the source and the receiver move at the same
exact speed?

= In the garbage bin it goes

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
    ... It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove ... that there is no absolute continuum. ... mirror are moving together through a quiescent continuum. ... with "a new analysis of the MMX", ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
    ... It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove ... that there is no absolute continuum. ... mirror are moving together through a quiescent continuum. ... and the mirror depends on the number of wavelengths between them. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
    ... It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove ... that there is no absolute continuum. ... this would only make sense if the light source were moving with respect to the mirrors. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Michelson-Morley experiment
    ... > regarding the Michelson-Morley experiment. ... Special Relativity predicts that the observed speed of ... of the absolute speed of the source or that of the receiver. ... In the Michelson-Morley experiment, the relative velocity ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
    ... It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove ... that there is no absolute continuum. ... Tom Roberts: ... Harald ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)