Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil


"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:CZvUg.68192$aP3.11133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<cafeinst@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159890606.459289.181950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Has anyone read this paper?
|
| http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-10.PDF
|
| It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove
| that there is no absolute continuum. Any comments about it? It seems to
| me to be very surprising. His argument is not very complicated; I'd
| like to hear the opinions of the experts on this.
|
| Thank you,
| Craig

Christo I. Christov says: "The emission theory of light assumed that the
"particles" of light were supposed to move in a resting continuum with
velocity c."

That is a bald faced LIE.

The emission theory of light DEMONSTRATES

Brilliant :-)
According to Androfart theories don't assume, but demonstrate.
No wonder everyone treats you like canine excrement ;-)

Dirk Vdm


.