Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:12:18 GMT
<cafeinst@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159890606.459289.181950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Has anyone read this paper?
|
| http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-10.PDF
|
| It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove
| that there is no absolute continuum. Any comments about it? It seems to
| me to be very surprising. His argument is not very complicated; I'd
| like to hear the opinions of the experts on this.
|
| Thank you,
| Craig
Christo I. Christov says: "The emission theory of light assumed that the
"particles" of light were supposed to move in a resting continuum with
velocity c."
That is a bald faced LIE.
The emission theory of light DEMONSTRATES that the "photons" of light DO
move with velocity 299,792.4562 kilometers per second, plus or minus 1.1
meters per second
relative to the source and PROVEN by MMX and by Sagnac, where fringe shift
IS evident and the basis of the ring laser gyroscope.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
His conclusion: "The theory of Michelson-Morley interference experiment is
revisited from the point of view of the wave theory of light" doesn't take
into account his lies or his drool.
Androcles.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- References:
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: cafeinst
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Prev by Date: Re: Speculations on the Neutrino Theory of Light
- Next by Date: Re: Lagrange in GR ?
- Previous by thread: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Next by thread: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
