Re: New Look on Relativity
- From: rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 3 Oct 2006 08:39:28 -0700
spaceflow wrote:
rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
spaceflow wrote:
In my work "The Spacetime Phenomena Part 1", published on
http://www.angelfire.com/pq/spaceflow/index.html, the features of
relativity are derived on base of conception of the spacetime continuum
as a real space-time structure. The results presented differ somewhat
from the Einstein's theory in the following items:
1/ the formulas derived for time dilation, length contraction and mass
increase slightly differ from Einstein's equations,
2/ the existence of the preferred inertial system is derived.
Hi,
You did a tremendous amount of work. Unfortunately , your theory has a
lot more differences from SR than the 2 listed above. As a consequence,
it should predict different results for quite a few well known
experiments, and that means the death of your theory.
spaceflow wrote:
Maybe you are right concerning the death of my theory, maybe not.
Surely, my work does not start from SR and predicts different results
as well. Is hard to tell whether the experiments performed are more
likely in accordance with SR (GR) or with spaceflow theory. Compared
with GR however, the space flow theory predicts quite precisely the
perihelion advance of the planet Mercury (see
http://www.spaceflow.sk/grav13c.html)
Your theory is refuted by previously run experiments. This renders your
theory null.
.
- References:
- Re: New Look on Relativity
- From: spaceflow
- Re: New Look on Relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: SR false?
- Next by Date: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Previous by thread: Re: New Look on Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: New Look on Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|