Re: New Look on Relativity
- From: "spaceflow" <first@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Oct 2006 08:25:38 -0700
Sue... wrote:
spaceflow wrote:
In my work "The Spacetime Phenomena Part 1", published on
http://www.angelfire.com/pq/spaceflow/index.html,
I have to spare my browser the barrage of pop-ups and
redirects from that host. Try geocities, 250m or prohosting.
the features of
relativity are derived on base of conception of the spacetime continuum
as a real space-time structure.
OK... Didn't some bloke named Eisenstern or somesuch
try that some time ago?
The results presented differ somewhat
from the Einstein's theory in the following items:
Yeah! That was his name!
1/ the formulas derived for time dilation, length contraction and mass
increase slightly differ from Einstein's equations,
Are these pages consitant with your changes ?
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node50.html
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node126.html
2/ the existence of the preferred inertial system is derived.
Here is a 'squishy' prefered inertial system you can compare
yours with:
Plausible mechanism:
http://www.citebase.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:physics/0107015
http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/liquids/inddip.html
http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/GRAV.htm
Experiment:
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html
Commercial Product:
http://www.ixsea.com/downloads/techno/0001-Octans_highly_compact.pdf
Sue...
spaceflow wrote:
1/ I am surely not forcing you to accept the idea of static spacetime
continuum of a given structure. If you looked into my work, you would
see that I am giving it a break to change its density depending on
speed, and on position in gravitational field.
2/Thank you for interesting tips. The advance of my work is marked in
http://www.part3.spaceflow.sk/ .
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting Claim
- Next by Date: Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO
- Previous by thread: Re: New Look on Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: New Look on Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
