Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: jamesahart79@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 3 Oct 2006 10:25:31 -0700
A single experiment never proves anything. I don't have to read the
paper because I know that relativity has been tested by a large number
of independent experiments which approach it from a multitude of
directions. These other experiments covered many of the alternative
ways to view the Michelson-Morely experiment, as well as confiming the
original null result. Focusing on one result as though it were the
end-all and be-all of a theory is very bad science.
rambus2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
cafeinst@xxxxxxx wrote:
Has anyone read this paper?
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-10.PDF
It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove
that there is no absolute continuum. Any comments about it? It seems to
me to be very surprising. His argument is not very complicated; I'd
like to hear the opinions of the experts on this.
Thank you,
Craig
1. Published in "Regress in Physics"?
+
2. "Doppler Effect" when the source and the receiver move at the same
exact speed?
= In the garbage bin it goes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: Barry
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- References:
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: cafeinst
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: rambus2005
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Prev by Date: Re: SR false?
- Next by Date: Re: SR false?
- Previous by thread: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Next by thread: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Index(es):
Loading