Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: Barry <sasalobo@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:34:29 -0500
jamesahart79@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
A single experiment never proves anything. I don't have to read the
paper because I know that relativity has been tested by a large number
of independent experiments which approach it from a multitude of
directions. These other experiments covered many of the alternative
ways to view the Michelson-Morely experiment, as well as confiming the
original null result. Focusing on one result as though it were the
end-all and be-all of a theory is very bad science..
I agree, we don't have to read the paper.
We already know what's correct and what isn't correct.
Looking at alternative viewpoints is not only very bad science, it can be mighty confusing.
Barry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: cafeinst
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- References:
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: cafeinst
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: rambus2005
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: jamesahart79
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Prev by Date: Re: SR false?
- Next by Date: Re: Absolute Coordinate System
- Previous by thread: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Next by thread: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
