Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:15:16 +0200
<cafeinst@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159890606.459289.181950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Has anyone read this paper?
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-10.PDF
It claims that the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't really prove
that there is no absolute continuum. Any comments about it? It seems to
me to be very surprising. His argument is not very complicated; I'd
like to hear the opinions of the experts on this.
Thank you,
Craig
Without having seen that particular paper: this is well known, both in the
literature and also in this newsgroup. See for example some old comments by
Tom Roberts:
http://google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f46b785e80425dd7
http://google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/dc860f85451a0e54
http://google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a6f110865893d962
Harald
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- References:
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- From: cafeinst
- Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Prev by Date: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Next by Date: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Previous by thread: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Next by thread: Re: Michelson-Morley: Much ado about nil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
