Re: COMPOSITION OF THE NEUTRINO

Golden Boar wrote:
vergon@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

[snip]



Why don't you do a little research before you start to spouting your
stupid nonsense.
You truly are a clueless idiot, here's a quick recap of some of your
nonsense,

Planck's constant has mass.

VERGON

If you wern't so stupid you would understand DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS and
you would know that h is a unit of action, one of its dimensions being
mass.


The photon has mass because Planck's constant has mass.

VERGON

Ipso facto


An upper limit on photon mass of 10^-51 means that that the mass of the
photon is greater than 10^-51 kg.

VERGON

You should learn to read better -- then you would not misquote me.


An experiment which establishes an upper limit on photon mass means
that the experiment has detected the mass of the photon.

VERGON

Never said that either. First of all, I have always said that the
experiment does not determine the upper limit of the photon but of the
COULOMB field. And I have calculated the mass of the coulomb field
which is lower than the mass given by Nieto & Goldhaber.

Because you cannot read, I want to stress I said COULOMB FIELD not
GALAXY field.
Since you are an excuse for a physicist, you compare apples to oranges
-- and then have the timerity to call your superiors "stupid" and
"idiot".


The spin of the particle determines its charge.

Next time, before you post another pile of nonsense, read up on the
subject first.

VERGON

Before you post idiotic posts, learn to read with comprehension.



[snip]

.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast