Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:58:42 GMT
<mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1160342501.853559.38310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1160327726.964034.211870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1160260547.973643.98100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"Brian Kennelly" <bwkennelly@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:6zUVg.3669$gM1.3580@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorcerer wrote:
How about up to here?
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
How fine am I doing?
OK. I think I can condense your argument down to this:
You don't believe that it is possible to define t' (tau) in a way that satisfies:
1/2(t'(0,20)) = t'(32,16)
Yours is an assertion easily disproved by example.
If we define
t'(x,t) = -3x/16 + t
then
t'(0,20) = 20
t'(32,16) = 10
and the equation is satisfied.
(Note, I didn't check your numbers, nor did I try to give the SR equation. I simply provided an example to show that
your
objection is without merit.)
check his limits:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Limit.html
check his equations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Doofus.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Persuasive.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroDistri.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ToothlessBite.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Competent.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/UseTrans.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sheesh.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DivZero.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Think.html
[snip]
... and check his diapers
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Orgasm.html
Sorry, de gevraagde pagina kan niet gevonden worden.
Page not found - HTTP 404
Sorry.
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Androrgasm.html
Thanks for letting me know.
Dirk Vdm
What is STATCOUNTER?
A free yet reliable invisible web tracker, highly configurable hit
counter and real-time detailed web stats. Insert a simple piece of
our code on your web page and you will be able to analyse and monitor
all the visitors to your website in real-time!
http://www.statcounter.com/privacy.html
You are monitoring all the visitors to your website. I don't think that
it is ethically allowed.
Marcel Luttgens
:-))
"A Crackpot's Sence of Ethics":
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/CrackpotEthics.html
Way to go, Marcel.
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- References:
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Zoe
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Brian Kennelly
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Brian Kennelly
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- From: mluttgens
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- Prev by Date: Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
- Next by Date: Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
- Previous by thread: Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- Next by thread: Re: SR fundamental contradiction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|