Re: Negative Mass


Tom Roberts wrote:
LEJ Brouwer wrote:
[to me]
You are so anti-progress [...]

I am merely pointing out that what you consider to be "progress" is not.
IMHO it is at best useless, and at worst a serious regress.

Fortunately for the rest of us, your opinion is of no value whatsoever.

In particular, thinking you can model neutrinos in neutrons and beta
decay, without including all the other known weak interaction physics,
is utterly hopeless. <shrug>

As usual you have no idea what you are talking about.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Negative Mass
    ... You are so anti-progress ... I am merely pointing out that what you consider to be "progress" is not. ... the electrostatic potential energy of the +proton ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How Common Lisp sucks
    ... Where's your proposed solution? ... I'm still at the stage of trying to convince people ... I don't accept the proposition that pointing out problems equates ... progress - it just points out problems. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: How Common Lisp sucks
    ... Where's your proposed solution? ... I'm still at the stage of trying to convince people ... I don't accept the proposition that pointing out problems equates ... progress - it just points out problems. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Forward Progress Lines
    ... skewed forward ahead into teh future why might this be? ... Progress lines pointing to the right mean the task is ahead of schedule. ...
    (microsoft.public.project)