Re: Faster than Light?
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:51:32 GMT
"harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1161331815_15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Peri of Pera" <riedt1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:1161230538.940020.97710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Faster than Light?
| >
| > The theory of relativity claims that the motion of physical objects
| > cannot exceed a speed of 300,000km/sec. However, we know from
| > experience (e.g. equatorial rocket launchings, multistage rocket
| > vehicles etc) that the final velocity of objects is their starting
| > velocity plus their own velocity. There is no reason to believe a
| > maximum applies.
|
| We know from experience (experiments with fast moving objects) quite the
| contrary. Thus your starting base is erroneous.
We know YOU are a lying ***. You are not "we". Thus your starting base is
erroneous.
Androcles
.
- References:
- Faster than Light?
- From: Peri of Pera
- Re: Faster than Light?
- From: harry
- Faster than Light?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
- Next by Date: Re: Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas?
- Previous by thread: Re: Faster than Light?
- Next by thread: Faster than Light?
- Index(es):
Loading