Re: classical / relativistic approximation


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hqve14-pfc.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Sean McIlroy
| <sean_mcilroy@xxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on 28 Oct 2006 23:09:22 -0700
| <1162102162.901291.136340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| > hi all
| >
| > one often encounters a claim worded somewhat as follows:
| >
| > *) classical and lorentz transformations agree closely when speeds are
| > small
| >
| > is there a precise, epsilon-delta style formulation of this claim?
| >
| > peace
| > stm
| >
|
| Newton:
|
| x' = x-vt
| t' = t
|
| SR:
|
| x' = g*(x-vt)
| t' = g*(t-vx/c^2)
|
| where g = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

Which you cannot derive because you have your head up your arse,
maliciously spreading lies for the crimimal *** you are.

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm


|
| Clearly,
you are a total arsehole. Very clearly.

Androcles


.