Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
- From: sal <pragmatist@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:39:29 -0500
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:48:44 +0000, Tom Roberts wrote:
sal wrote:
Imagine two electrons, which we call A and B, initially stationary with
respect to each other.
They repel each other (of course) and start to move apart. But an
electron has a dipole magnetic field; see, e.g.,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_moment
As B moves away from A, it moves through A's magnetic field. It
therefore must feel a force perpendicular to its line of motion. The
direction of the force is not along the radius connecting A to B,
whether current, retarded, anticipated, or whatever. How can angular
momentum be conserved in this case?
The electrons radiate EM radiation. It is total angular momentum that is
conserved, and the EM field can carry it as can the electrons themselves.
That was my best guess, because (a) the electrons are accelerating so
they should radiate, and (b) because I couldn't think of anyplace else for
the missing L to go. :-)
Tom Roberts
--
Nospam becomes physicsinsights to fix the email
.
- References:
- Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
- From: sal
- Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
- From: Tom Roberts
- Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
- Next by Date: Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
- Previous by thread: Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|