sci.physics.relativity
- Re: Interpreting the MMX null result,
shuba
- A Few Good Natural Philosophers,
Robert
- "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics",
Ebyam
- Speed of Light,
jillbones
- When can we use special relativity?,
fitz
- Re: Can electricity be wirelessly transmitted?,
PD
- Modification using rotational dynamics,
oriel36
- NEWTON - EINSTEIN - Vlcek comparison,
vlcek
- EINSTEIN - Vlcek comparison,
vlcek
- George Hammond YOu'rE NoTHinG BuTT a FuCKinG IdioT TrOLL,
dave in Lake Villa
- Re: Theoretical idea to construct nuclei,
Sorcerer
- The Liar Paradox - a modern example,
Sorcerer
- "The Einstein Hoax",
Toob
- Re: What does the theory of relativity say about our sex-lives???,
shuba
- Re: Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic background fractile 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae: Murray 2006.11.21,
Spoonfed
- Newtonian mechanics and physical considerations,
oriel36
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
ftl
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
rstn
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
rstn
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Eric Gisse
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Eric Gisse
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
pmb
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
pmb
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Mike
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
JanPB
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Mike
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
JanPB
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sorcerer
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
pmb
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Mike
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Mike
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Mike
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Mike
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sorcerer
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
pmb
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Mike
A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
Re: time rate,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: relativistic entropy,
Sue...
"The Error in Relativistic Physics",
Toob
relativity vs velocity addition,
lkoluk2003
Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit,
Norman Bates
Do baryons generate mesons from the tidal forces around small black holes?,
michalchik
Re: the most fundamental in relativity,
dlzc
Relativity at Siemens,
josefmatz
Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Black hole questions,
Sorcerer
- Re: Black hole questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
dlzc
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
Wai Yu Wong
- Re: Black hole questions,
sal
- Re: Black hole questions,
Tom Roberts
Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Tom Roberts
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
sal
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
sal
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Tom Roberts
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Tom Roberts
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
John Baez
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sue...
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
shuba
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
John Baez
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
pmb61
Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
sal
Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :),
harry
Re: Michelson Morley explained by Total Energy equation,
Koobee Wublee
The curvature of the light rays.,
Stamenin
Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force,
Koobee Wublee
"Is String Theory Justified?",
Toob
symmetric twins paradox,
lkoluk2003
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sorcerer
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
harry
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
badd_xi2
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Igor
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
lkoluk2003
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Spoonfed
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
lkoluk2003
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
badd_xi2
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
badd_xi2
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
badd_xi2
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
Sue...
- Re: symmetric twins paradox,
maxwell
"What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe",
Toob
Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
jan . verheul
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Norman Bates
Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Eric Gisse
Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Norman Bates
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Norman Bates
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Norman Bates
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof),
Sue...
working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Sorcerer
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Sue...
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Todd
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Y.Porat
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Tom Roberts
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Psy-Kosh
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:,
Koobee Wublee
Speciial Relativity was stillborn (proof #1 and #2) + coping with grief.. hahaha!,
Sorcerer
Re: Disproof of SR attempted?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Mdmeenken
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Mdmeenken
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
jem
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
shuba
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Bill Hobba
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Bill Hobba
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
JanPB
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Bill Hobba
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
THE_ONE
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Tom Roberts
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
harry
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
besonne
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof),
Koobee Wublee
Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Bill Hobba
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
leek
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Jim Black
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
leek
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Jim Black
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Jim Black
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Jim Black
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Jim Black
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Jim Black
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
bz
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sorcerer
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Sue...
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Igor
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: simple question thay cant answer,
Alex
Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
dlzc
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Mike
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Mike
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Igor
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Norman Bates
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Igor
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Bill Hobba
- I'd be damned, I am "conversing" with Joseph Levy,
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Igor
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Brian Kennelly
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Message not available
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin,
Norman Bates
- Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
Norman Bates
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
Norman Bates
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
Norman Bates
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
jem
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
shuba
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
Norman Bates
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
harry
Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
karandash2000
<Possible follow-ups>
Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof),
jan . verheul
Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Erk.D
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
leek
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Erk.D
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Message not available
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Sue...
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated,
Erk.D
The Shape of a Point,
Barry
"The Arrow of Time",
Egap
Relativistic Action,
actionintegral
Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
Dono
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
dej4
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Message not available
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
dej4
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
karandash2000
Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
Egap
Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
harry
Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX,
shevek
Under (negative) pressure,
Leo
Special Relativity is Dead!,
jan . verheul