sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: jcon
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: dlzc
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: jillbones
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: shuba
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: harry
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jem
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• SR is approximately valid, physics is not math.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: harry
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: harry
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Interpreting the MMX null result
  • From: shuba
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Can electricity be wirelessly transmitted?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ebyam
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Can electricity be wirelessly transmitted?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Speed of Light
  • From: jillbones
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: fitz
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Little Harry's antirelativistic work
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• When can we use special relativity?
  • From: fitz
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Russell
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Russell
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Russell
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can electricity be wirelessly transmitted?
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Russell
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: vern
• Modification using rotational dynamics
  • From: oriel36
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What does the theory of relativity say about our sex-lives???
  • From: Chatter Nougat Chew-Chew
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• NEWTON - EINSTEIN - Vlcek comparison
  • From: vlcek
• EINSTEIN - Vlcek comparison
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Alex
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: What does the theory of relativity say about our sex-lives???
  • From: pmb
• Re: What does the theory of relativity say about our sex-lives???
  • From: sal
• George Hammond YOu'rE NoTHinG BuTT a FuCKinG IdioT TrOLL
  • From: dave in Lake Villa
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: pmb
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: pmb
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: sal
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Theoretical idea to construct nuclei
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• The Liar Paradox - a modern example
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: maxwell
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: pmb
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: pmb
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: John Baez
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Igor
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic background fractile 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae: Murray 2006.11.21
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: sal
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Toob
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Alex
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Alex
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: shuba
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What does the theory of relativity say about our sex-lives???
  • From: shuba
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic background fractile 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae: Murray 2006.11.21
  • From: Rich Murray
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: sal
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic background fractile 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae: Murray 2006.11.21
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Are there infinites in the physical world?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: the most fundamental in relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are there infinites in the physical world?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: JanPB
• Newtonian mechanics and physical considerations
  • From: oriel36
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: shuba
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: rstn
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: rstn
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: rstn
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: rstn
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Alex
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: ftl
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: bz
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Are there infinites in the physical world?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativistic entropy
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: harry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Are there infinites in the physical world?
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: time rate
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: time rate
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: time rate
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativistic entropy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Do baryons generate mesons from the tidal forces around small black holes?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: harry
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Mike
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Michelson Morley explained by Total Energy equation
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Norman Bates
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Toob
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: harry
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Sorcerer
• relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: the most fundamental in relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the most fundamental in relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Michelson Morley explained by Total Energy equation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relaTIvity doesn't fit
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: harry
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Michelson Morley explained by Total Energy equation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Do baryons generate mesons from the tidal forces around small black holes?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson Morley explained by Total Energy equation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do baryons generate mesons from the tidal forces around small black holes?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Michelson Morley explained by Total Energy equation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do baryons generate mesons from the tidal forces around small black holes?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Do baryons generate mesons from the tidal forces around small black holes?
  • From: michalchik
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: bz
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: sal
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Mike
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Mike
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Alex
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the most fundamental in relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: sal
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: sal
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity at Siemens
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Stick to the planes for now
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: harry
• Relativity at Siemens
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Stick to the planes for now
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: pmb61
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Erk.D
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Michelson Morley explained by Total Energy equation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The curvature of the light rays.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: The curvature of the light rays.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The curvature of the light rays.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Karandash - Expected to commit suicide soon
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Karandash - Expected to commit suicide soon
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Igor
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: jem
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Toob
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: harry
• symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: harry
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: besonne
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: harry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: harry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: harry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: harry
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: sal
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: jem
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: harry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jem
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Toob
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Karandash - Parrot
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Todd
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• working through Gravitation (MTW) and have a possibly stupid question:
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: karandash2000
• Speciial Relativity was stillborn (proof #1 and #2) + coping with grief.. hahaha!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: shuba
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Disproof of SR attempted?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: bz
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Erk.D
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Dono
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Mike
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: leek
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: leek
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: leek
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Erk.D
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: dej4
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: greysky
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: leek
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: leek
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: leek
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: simple question thay cant answer
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Barry
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Barry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: space and time
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• I'd be damned, I am "conversing" with Joseph Levy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: shevek
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Barry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: space and time
  • From: robert
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: shevek
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: shevek
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The new crank "Barry" is the old crank "Jackie"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: dej4
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: greysky
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: greysky
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Shape of a Point
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: greysky
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: greysky
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: greysky
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: greysky
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: The new crank "Barry" is the old crank "Jackie"
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: actionintegral
• The Shape of a Point
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Egap
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• The new crank "Barry" is the old crank "Jackie"
  • From: karandash2000
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Egap
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Action
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Relativistic Action
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stupid question for Tusselader
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Stupid question for Tusselader
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Tusselader
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stupid question for Tusselader
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Tusselader
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Stupid question for Tusselader
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Under (negative) pressure
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Under (negative) pressure
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Under (negative) pressure
  • From: Leo
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Special Relativity is Dead!
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Russell
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Mike" and the circular logic
  • From: karandash2000
• Stupid question for Tusselader
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: J . Verheul01
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "Mike" and the circular logic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Mike" and the circular logic
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Russell
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: y . y . porat
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: sal
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: J . Verheul01
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Egap
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: J . Verheul01
• Re: GR...A theory of gravity or blind to gravity and all isotropic forces
  • From: Chatter Nougat Chew-Chew
• Re: GR...A theory of gravity or blind to gravity and all isotropic forces
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR...A theory of gravity or blind to gravity and all isotropic forces
  • From: Chatter Nougat Chew-Chew
• GR...A theory of gravity or blind to gravity and all isotropic forces
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• FTL and references to works
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: sal
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: sal
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: newbie question: lorentz transformations
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Rotation in GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: space and time
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: newbie question: lorentz transformations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• newbie question: lorentz transformations
  • From: Sean McIlroy
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simulataneity
  • From: Brit
• Simulataneity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: space and time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: space and time
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: space and time
  • From: oriel36
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: space and time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space and time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: space and time
  • From: Tom Roberts
• space and time
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Stupid question for Dork Van de merde
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Russell
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Mike
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• FTL and references to works
  • From: Raghar
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Raghar
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Egap
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: greysky
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: EINSTEINIANS: EINSTEIN'S EQUATION IS WRONG
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: EINSTEINIANS: EINSTEIN'S EQUATION IS WRONG
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: dhjoubert
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: dhjoubert
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Rotation in GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: greysky
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: xxein
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple TIME/Clock Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force" (was: Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right?...)
  • From: Mike
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Mike
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FTL and references to works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re:Reffo's misunderstanding of "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: jambaugh
• FTL and references to works
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Reffo
• Re: CLEVEREST EINSTEINIANS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force" (was: Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right?...)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Barry
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The relativity of the distance.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: CLEVEREST EINSTEINIANS
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: y . y . porat
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: expanding matter theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: PD
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: PD
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Reffo
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Russell
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Russell
• Re: Sound and Science
  • From: sal
• Re: Sound and Science
  • From: sal
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Sound and Science
  • From: sal
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Russell
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: PD
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Sound and Science
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: PD
• Re: what is this called?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: what is this called?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sound and Science
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Norman Bates
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Reffo
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Galilean Transformations: Walking on Water
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The GPS second vs the ground clock second
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what is this called?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Headline News - Eric Geese Utters First Scientific Word.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what is this called?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what is this called?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• what is this called?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: shevek
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: Brian Kennelly
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: Igor
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: sal
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: sal
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: What's gamma do?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sue...
• What's gamma do?
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Reffo
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: YBM
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: sal
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The GPS second vs the ground clock second
  • From: The Thing
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: THE_ONE
• How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Complete failure of the inverse square law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Complete failure of the inverse square law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: YBM
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Complete failure of the inverse square law
  • From: AngryOldMan
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: kicker3082
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Complete failure of the inverse square law
  • From: Sue...
• Complete failure of the inverse square law
  • From: AngryOldMan
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Motion: a revolutionary book?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: mluttgens
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Reffo
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: harry
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: kicker3082
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: harry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
  • From: kicker3082
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: fitz
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: AJAY DOES believe in advertisement.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: karandash2000
• AJAY DOES believe in advertisement.
  • From: dej4
• AJAY does not believe in advertisement.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: harry
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Is Saul Perlmutter right? Do we have Einstein's cosmological constant?
  • From: fitz
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Dono
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: ma
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: harry
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: harry
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: question (length contraction)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Yaem
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: fitz
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Reffo
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: harry
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Todd
• Re: SR clock question
  • From: Sue...
• SR clock question
  • From: David
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Harry
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: harry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• newbie on relativity theory
  • From: Harry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: shevek
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: shevek
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: kenseto
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: kenseto
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: PD
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: PD
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Darkness travels faster than light
  • From: marika
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Erot
• Re: relativity as a metric space
  • From: Erot
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: PONDERABLE MASS DOES NOT CONVERT TO KINETIC ENERGY
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: na
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: one way light speed
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• one way light speed
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Todd
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: sal
• Re: HAMMOND VS EICKMEIER
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: zzbun...@netscape.net" WHEN Einstein got the second Nobel Prize ( you claim) ???
  • From: marika
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Aether or whatever
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: sal
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Todd
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Russell
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Russell
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• johnreed take 1A - October 18, 2006
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Quantum spacetime
  • From: AngryOldMan
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: sal
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: Dono
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: sal
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: mg
• Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: bz
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: sal
• "Gravity"
  • From: Erot
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: harry
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Quantum Motion: a revolutionary book?
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: mg
• The princile of the relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Constant Speed of light = Constant Motion of all objects ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: speed of sound experiment
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Barry
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Todd
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Mike
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: Successive boosts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Sorcerer
• Successive boosts
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: speed of sound experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: sal
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Russell
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: sal
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Russell
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: badd_xi2
• GR and Thermodynamics
  • From: Barry
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Barry
• Re: I Love GR
  • From: Sue...
• I Love GR
  • From: Barry
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: mg
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: David
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: David
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Erot
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: harry
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein’s E=mc2
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: Y.Porat
• Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: speed of sound experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: speed of sound experiment
  • From: D
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: speed of sound experiment
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: speed of sound experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: shevek
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• speed of sound experiment
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Russell
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Something special about the event horizon
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Igor
• Michelson-Morley, Bradley, Fizeau, Airy and "Aspin Bubbles". Consequences.
  • From: Yoël Lana-Renault
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Igor
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: But Russell said SR is eas
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: shevek
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: But Russell said SR is eas
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: harry
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Mike
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: Dono
• But Russell said SR is easy
  • From: Numbchux
• Re: Karl Popper & the Corny Conceits of Empiricism
  • From: Barry
• Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein?s E=mc2
  • From: badd_xi2
• Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein’s E=mc2
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein’s E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: harry
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: harry
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Karl Popper & the Corny Conceits of Empiricism
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inertia : Inert In Activity (?)
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Russell
• Re: does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• does circumference contract with velocity?
  • From: David
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: classical / relativistic approximation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Karl Popper & the Corny Conceits of Empiricism
  • From: Barry
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nomenclature--sorta basic
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: David
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Symmetry
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: PD
• Re: Problem with velocity composition in SR - math/guru help
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein and the Aether
  • From: harry
• Re: Gerald L. O'Barr and the At Theory.
  • From: shevek
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Electron's magnetic field: A point of confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spacetime Questions for Mr. Bielawski, Mr. McCullough, Dr. Roberts, and Others Interested
  • From: sal
• Re: Einstein and the Aether
  • From: shuba