Re: But Russell said SR is easy


karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


Really, this is the apex of imbecility in your argument.
Imagine for a second that k=k(v) as you are arguing for. The
experiments put severe bounds on k, please explain how k=k(v) changes
anything. Start waving arms.

Your teacher waved his hand so you can wake up while he was teaching
functions but you contunued sleeping.

I asked you before, have any experiments being done where the speed of
the source was a good fraction of the speed of light?

Your established bounds are within experimental error for the general
class of experiments I am talking about.

Do you think this is hand waving?

Generalization: imagine that one way light speed varies with
orientation according to the more general formula c+f(v). Since the
experiments quoted put severe bounds on f(v) explain how light speed
can still be anisotropic. Start waving arms.

Your red herring above does not find any ground with me. Try it some
place else.

Mike






Really.

.