Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 7 Nov 2006 07:11:35 -0800
Mike wrote:
I asked you before, have any experiments being done where the speed of
the source was a good fraction of the speed of light?
Mike
I doubt that you can read (or comprehend) but here is ONE example of
high speed light source in the FACK list:
2. Alvaeger F.J.M. Farley, J. Kjellman and I Wallin, Physics Letters
12, 260 (1964).
Measured the speed of gamma rays from the decay of fast pi0 (~0.99975
c) to be c with a resolution of 400 parts per million.
Is 0.99975 c close enough to c for you?
It is going to be interesting to see where you go next, crackpots never
ever give up.
Next.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- References:
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- Prev by Date: Re: The princile of the relativity.
- Next by Date: Re: The princile of the relativity.
- Previous by thread: Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- Next by thread: Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|