Re: New interpretation of E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2


cjcountess wrote:
Hi Ken, this is Conrad

Concerning last post, at the begining Ken I should have said more
accurately
Time ^2 looks a lot to me like c^2 as the speed of light across the
minimum
set scale distance or metric might be said to represent a minimum
unite of time. Such as a Planck unite of time or something
corresponding to it. But you probably knew what I meant although as you
warned, physics is an exacting science. This brings me to something I
mistakenly left out in the last post but which I think is worth
posting. A response to something you said:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
Hi Conrad,
I understand, and grant latitute to post's in groups,
however, physics is an exacting science, for example
Planck's "h" is erg x seconds and is either an action
unit or, as some reason, an angular momentum unit.

cjcountess wrote:
Thank you for your patients and as an independent, unorthodox
researcher working alone I find this forum, and in particular
with your
input,
indispensable as a place to bounce ideas off of people and get an
idea as
to weather they make sense to anyone but myself as well as
refining them
with the ideas gathered from both constructive and destructive
criticism.
As I see it, if h is a unite of action it is also a unite of
energy
because action and energy both imply motion. I subscribe to the
definition
that the most basic form of energy is motion so I think that the
term
action as a description of h is a matter of convention.
Besides h is the constant unite in the energy -mass formula E or
M =hf/c^2, so it
must be a basic unite of energy - mass. I am also familiar with
the other reduced
Planck's constant as a combination of the regular Planck's
constant "h" divided by 2pi as in h
/ 2pi or h-bar as an angular momentum unite. I prefer using the
regular h
instead of h-bar. I equate the regular Planck's constant or h as

equivalent to c before frequency is factored in because both the
speed of
light is constant regardless of frequency or before frequency is
factored
in and the action/energy of h is constant regardless of frequency
or
before frequency is factored in. As such c and h before
frequency is factored in might represent energy traveling in
a relatively straight line at lowest frequency and ground state
energy before any
frequency is factored in above 1.
But it seems that h-bar representing
angular momentum is more related to rest mass or energy in
circular
rotation as the h/2pi implies h divided around a circle analogous
to c^2 as I interpret it, although I may be wrong.
This difference between the two Planck's constants h and h-bar
may if fact
mirror the difference between Newton's Big G and the other
proposed g as
the quantum gravitational constant equivalent to mass - energy
constants h and speed of light constant c. After all Newton did not
have the benefit of
the knowledge that energy and matter are equivalent, the
constancy of the
speed of light or Planck's constant. He started from the most
basic
premise known at the time which was matter, energy, space and
gravity as
separate entities without knowing that matter can be broken down
into
energy, the energy-mass equivalence, and that mass-energy has a
constant which is h or that energy itself
sense it does have mass, bends toward gravity. If he knew this he
may have sort the
relationship of the mass-energy constant to the gravity constant
on more basic level than rest mass or matter "that of energy".

Talk to you later
Conrad
---------------------==================
Well my point of view is here

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-inventor-of-second-postulate.htm

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DNA carries information
    ... information is a physical property of matter via its connection ... John's paper begins with an epigraph from Weiner: ... is information, not matter or energy. ... particular mass. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba
    ... > with the remnants of the BB and consider mass as an anomoly? ... of the physical universe is not matter. ... > to abandon that time and substance (energy). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... > I got it long before you were born, without matter ... How many bottles of energy have you seen? ... >>mass in the same sentence and not recognizing your error. ... >>has a quantity, i.e. it is a measurement, then it is called a kilogram, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • The most famous equation is a hundred years old
    ... But by September, confident in the result, Einstein wrote a three-page ... It's an equation that tells of matter, ... the matter could exert on its environment (its energy). ... mass as a baseball speeding along at 100 miles per hour. ...
    (uk.philosophy.humanism)
  • Re: The massless photon?
    ... This shows that the mass of the photon is ... > energy functions which are vectors applied at 90° to each other. ... > matter in motion. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast