Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: "Mike" <eleatis@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Nov 2006 14:30:47 -0800
karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Mike wrote:
I asked you before, have any experiments being done where the speed of
the source was a good fraction of the speed of light?
Mike
I doubt that you can read (or comprehend) but here is ONE example of
high speed light source in the FACK list:
2. Alvaeger F.J.M. Farley, J. Kjellman and I Wallin, Physics Letters
12, 260 (1964).
Measured the speed of gamma rays from the decay of fast pi0 (~0.99975
c) to be c with a resolution of 400 parts per million.
Is 0.99975 c close enough to c for you?
It is going to be interesting to see where you go next, crackpots never
ever give up.
I agree, even the "crackpot" Galileo did not give up even under house
arrest and in the court he wishspered "it moves".
Next.
I do not expect you to understand the fundamental flaw of the paper you
mentioned because you are so prejudiced about the subject.
Yes, these papers involve such a fundamental mistake that it is
embarishing to even mention it and also wonder why nobody challenges
them.
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- References:
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: Mike
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- From: karandash2000
- Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- Prev by Date: Re: What do Relativists and Baboons Have in Common?
- Next by Date: Re: one way light speed
- Previous by thread: Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- Next by thread: Re: But Russell said SR is easy
- Index(es):
Loading