Re: Symmetry
- From: "Barry" <Sirdry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Nov 2006 14:01:53 -0800
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect wrote:
..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry#Generalization_of_symmetry
Indeed.
And what more fundamental symmetry could there be than one between time
and space?
In Science space and time can only be relational."Before" and "after"
are just local concepts just like "in front of" or "behind".
Also, in my opinion, to deny the existence of "Absolute Time" only to
let it in the back door by the name of "Universal Time" is shameless.
In Philosophy thinks might be different, but that's a discussion for
another place and another time - so to speak.
Barry
.
- References:
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Barry
- Re: Symmetry
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Barry
- Re: Symmetry
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Barry
- Re: Symmetry
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Barry
- Re: Symmetry
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Barry
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Barry
- Re: Symmetry
- From: badd_xi2
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Barry
- Re: Symmetry
- From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Symmetry
- Prev by Date: Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
- Next by Date: Re: The relativity of the distance.
- Previous by thread: Re: Symmetry
- Next by thread: Re: Symmetry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|