Re: Simulataneity
- From: karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Nov 2006 16:11:55 -0800
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1163546886.649405.155860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Barry wrote:
karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
.Isn't that what I stated?
.Now, do you want to try answering my questions?
.Barry
You really don't get it: you can't use ds^2=dx^2-dy^2 as a metric ..
Of course I can. In fact I did.
This is worth one of the "immortal fumbles".
He wants an entry, so he doesn't get one.
Dirk Vdm
Keep an eye on his posts, if he continues this way, he will become
"immortal". :-)
.
- References:
- Simulataneity
- From: Barry
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: Brit
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: Barry
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: Barry
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: Barry
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: Barry
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Simulataneity
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Simulataneity
- Prev by Date: Re: Simulataneity
- Next by Date: Re: newbie question: lorentz transformations
- Previous by thread: Re: Simulataneity
- Next by thread: Re: Simulataneity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|