Re: "Mike" and the circular logic


<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1163604653.648738.268790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mike wrote:

The proper way to do it is determine the minimum time light must cover
a given distance so that your measurements are significant. Thus, you
must vary the distance until you determine that there is no more
variation in k. This is a difficult experiment nobody has done. The
reason that is difficult is that nobody knows when local variations end
and global variation begin. You may need 1 Km and you will not be able
to do the experiment. The truth of the way the universe works conceals
itslef so that stupid people like you always get the results they
expect.

Mike


Drolly (drooly?) -Trolly
Here is a recap of your fumbles:

1.You asked for experiments that test c+kv, you got a list of about 10.
2.Then, you tried a ploy about k=k(v), you got the answer.
3.You then tried the ploy that v is not large enough, and that was
foiled (Alveger is at 0.99975c).
4. You mumbled and bungled something about not being able to match the
delays to the emitter and receiver, that only proved that you don't
understand simple delay matching and the fact that the respective
delays do not play any role in the experiment.
5. Then you said that the distance between emitter and receiver is a
function of c. It was pointed out to you that :
- Alveger did not use c in the definition of s
- THIS IS A BIG ONE: even if one used c to measure s, there is a
significant difference, the "c" used in measuring s comes from a lab
comoving source (do you know what that is?), so there is no dependence
of any "v" , so that your above argument is screwed. What Alveger and
other measured is the alleged c+kv coming from a lac MOVING source
6. In the above posting you did a GO TO 2 (like in the old days of
Fortran), so your circular logic is complete.


Next last ditch squirm. And try to put in some of your fumbling
"calculations". You are so much more drol when you "calculate".
Remember, in order to have a valid refutation you need to produce
calculations.

You mean those things like
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/BrainHoles.html
?

Dirk Vdm




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Mike" and the circular logic
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... a given distance so that your measurements are significant. ... delays do not play any role in the experiment. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • "Mike" and the circular logic
    ... a given distance so that your measurements are significant. ... and global variation begin. ... delays do not play any role in the experiment. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: deformation monitoring
    ... said:> Only use distance measurements to prisms, reflectorless is ... Couldn't agree more with this - wouldn't be without our Trimble 5600 ...
    (sci.engr.surveying)
  • Re: How the comet flies
    ... But in actual fact variation in results is observed, ... Of course the raw measurements "report" variations; ... you are also correct in assuming that free behaviour is required ... The Heiseinberg Uncertainty Principle is one such mathematical ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
    ... No. Maxwell was wrong. ... to determine the distance to the Moon to the cm, ... If the measurements were wrong due to the phenomena ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)