Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:17:56 GMT
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1163679177.044540.147220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1163671511.027324.20710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Communication in it most minimal form, the smallest event we
| > | can observe, involves no less than the motion of a remote
| > | electric charge.
| >
| >
| > Communication in it[s] most minimal form, the smallest event we
| > can observe, involves no less than the motion of a remote
| > magnetic marge.
| >
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/spin.gif
| >
| > My magnetic marges are faster than your electric charges,
| > and my chickens came before your eggs. Nah nah na nah na!
| >
| > Unless you can show otherwise, you are living in Dork's universe.
|
| I'll never make it to a spelling bee.
True.
| You'll never make it to a physics bee.
Been there, done that, got the T-shirt.
|
| Your *marges* are the nearfield magnetic couplings that only
| *appear* FTL.
You are living in Dork's universe, the speed of magnetic fields
*IS* the speed of light.
| They diminish by 1/r^3 and result from two
| source charges conspiring to move one destination charge.
___________
__________N|---------------O--\/\/\/\/\--r
How much does the spring "\/\/\" holding the iron ball O extend if
I change r from the magnet N?
You are living in Dork's universe.
| Not terribly efficient.
Liar, transformers are 99% efficient.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/spindistance.gif
It is your radiators that are terroristically not efficent. Get a bowl,
idiot,
or your trifle will be all over the table top when you bake it.
Trifle:
http://www.thefoody.com/pudding/sherrytrifle.html
Bowl:
http://www.lamit.ro/images/satellite-dish-lamit-hub.jpg
My magnetic marges are faster than your electric charges,
and my chickens came before your eggs. Nah nah na nah na!
[...]
Androcles.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- References:
- Special Relativity is Dead!
- From: jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- From: Sue...
- Special Relativity is Dead!
- Prev by Date: Re: Stupid question for Tusselader
- Next by Date: Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- Previous by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- Next by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
- Index(es):