Re: Special Relativity is Dead!

From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 16 Nov 2006 16:36:53 -0800

Sorcerer wrote:

"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:x747h.215552$3D1.63570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Obviously you are making it up as you go long.
| A hopeless case, when you can't guess yourself
| you reproduce in babblespeak someone else's guess.
| Over and out.
|

BTW, Design one of these

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=contactor&meta=

_____
C
C
C
C_____

|
|
o_o
o_o
o_o
o_o

:o)

Sue...

.

References:
- Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sue...
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sorcerer
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
  - From: Sorcerer

Prev by Date: Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
Next by Date: Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
Previous by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
Next by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
... | A hopeless case, ... | you reproduce in babblespeak someone else's guess. ... BTW, Design one of these ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
... > hwh a écrit: ... at 24 kHz no bits would be spoiled trying hopelessly to reproduce ... hopeless. ...
(alt.radio.digital)