Re: FTL and references to works
- From: badd_xi2@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 18 Nov 2006 01:11:09 -0800
Ilja Schmelzer wrote:
<badd_xi2@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb
Ilja Schmelzer wrote:have
"Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx> schrieb
"Ilja Schmelzer" <q6867901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx> schrieb
"Ilja Schmelzer" <q6867901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
The above argument depends only on the validity of the Lorentz
transformations. If they are true - preferred frame or not - you
notproblems eg LET has exactly the same problems.
That's meaningless. A Lorentz transformation is a transformation,
a statement. It has no truth value.
I beg to differ. It can be tested hence has truth value.
A transformation cannot be tested. It can be applied to something.
You must be one of those religious whackos who attempt to
validate silly philosophy as science by obfuscating the obvious.
I have simply tried to correct sloppy language.
Of course the lorentz transform can be tested. By applying it.
If we get a real result which differs from the result predicted by
the transformation, we have tested the transformation and found that
it doesn't agree with reality.
By applying a transformation you obtain another description, not a real
result. What you can, possibly, falsify is the claim that all laws of nature
are Lorentz covariant.
You are injecting meaningless babble to obfuscate the obvious.
If the laws are nature are (not) Lorentz covariant, then the
Lorentz transforms are correct (incorrect).
.
- References:
- FTL and references to works
- From: Raghar
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: badd_xi2
- Re: FTL and references to works
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- FTL and references to works
- Prev by Date: Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
- Next by Date: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- Previous by thread: Re: FTL and references to works
- Next by thread: Re: FTL and references to works
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|