Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: jan.verheul@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 19 Nov 2006 03:54:05 -0800
Mdmeenken schreef:
hmm,
I dont have to read the whole story,
the first sentence is enough,for now,
constant velocity does not give a time dilation,
so ,it looks to me you are ill informed
You are taking the easy way by reacting on statements that might not be
formulated 100% correct when considered in isolation.
However, from the rest of the story is clear that I know and reason
from the correct formulation that time delation is the result of
relative constant velocity, i.e. I will observe time delation with
clocks that have a constant, non-zero velocity, relative to my own
velocity. So my formulation is only incomplete at some points.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: Mdmeenken
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- References:
- Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: Mdmeenken
- Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Prev by Date: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- Next by Date: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Previous by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Next by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Index(es):