Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)


"THE_ONE" <floppy01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1163941308.937428.6430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| jan.verheul@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
| > If I am well informed, constant velocity movement causes time delation,
| > according to Special Relativity. Acceleration causes also time
| > dilation, according to General Relativity. Anyone with some
| > mathematical intuition and some feeling of how nature works can know
| > now that Relativity (Special as well as General) CANNOT be valid,
| > without considering the details of both theories.
| >
| > Velocity and acceleration are two completely different things, seen
| > from a mathematical viewpoint. They are related as derivative and
| > integral to each other. If both constant velocity and constant
| > acceleration lead to the same phenomena (time delation) you have messed
| > up things. It would be the same as if both acceleration and constant
| > velocity would cause (reaction)force.
| >
| > In the time before Newton and Galilei, people thought that force is
| > required for both constant velocity and (extra force) for acceleration.
| > It was not yet discovered that if you remove all drag (which is very
| > difficult or impossible in practice), constant velocity requires no
| > force for its maintenance. Twentyfirst physicists should have learned
| > this lesson. A quantity and its derivative (or integral) CAN NEVER HAVE
| > the same physical consequences, because they are entirely different
| > things, and in fact orthogonal. A theory in which a quantity and its
| > derivative have the same or similar effect (time delation in this case)
| > can NEVER be consistent.
| >
| > I have read many textbooks on Special and General Relativity, among
| > which the text of mister Einstein himself, and the famous "Lectures" of
| > Feynman. Virtually no writer discriminates consequently between
| > acceleration because of externally applied force, and acceleration
| > because of a freefall in a gravitation field. If I understood General
| > Relativity well, acceleration due to freefall in a gravitation field
| > causes no time delation because the free falling object is just taking
| > the "path of least resistance" in warped space. It is as if it were
| > inertial. If we take the words of mister Einstein seriously, we can
| > corner his idiot theory of Special Relativity in less than twenty lines
| > of plain english text. No equations required.
| >
| > Consider two clocks K and K' that are in orbit around some heavy body
| > (earth or sun or whatever). They are both in the same perfect circular
| > orbit, however, both clocks are orbiting in exactly the opposite
| > direction. They meet each other twice during each period of the orbit.
| > There is a slight difference in both orbits, so that the clocks will
| > not collide, but will approach each other close enough to synchronize
| > sufficiently precise.
| >
| > Both clocks are in freefall in a gravitation field, and so experience
| > no time delation because of acceleration. In fact, there is no speed
| > increase, so if there were time delation because of the gravitation
| > field, it is the same for both clocks, and therefore cancels out.
| >
| > Both clocks are "inertial" because they both follow the path of least
| > resistance in warped space. Each clock is constantly moving with regard
| > to the other. So according to Special Relativity each clock observes
| > that the other clock walks slower. After the initial synchronization
| > both clocks meet at the opposite position in the orbit. They compare
| > clocks. It appears that clock K is ahead of K' and K' is ahead of K...
| >
| > Peels of laughter......
| >
| > How is it possible that so many intelligent people (at least they
| > pretend...) cling to theories that are no more than rediculous
| > nonsense? Billions of dollars have been spend on research projects that
| > assume Special Relativity as if it were an axiom. Wasted! Mister
| > Einstein was one of the biggest jokers that science has known. He has
| > misled the world for more than 100 years (101 if I am well informed)
| > with a fallacy that is so convoluted that everyone thought it was
| > brilliant.
| >
| > Be prepared for the fourth proof of invalidity of SR. This time it will
| > be a well documented experiment with two atomic clocks in two
| > airoplanes...
| >
| > To be continued...
|
| Find the basics of the structure of reality, and all the confusing
| details vanish !
|
| Start at the following page for coverage of Motion analysis.
| http://www.outersecrets.com/real/2_motion.htm
|
| Last page is,
| http://www.outersecrets.com/real/6_events.htm
|
| Once the basics are understood, you can laugh at the misinterpretations
| of others.

Yawn...
Now the basics are understood, I can laugh at the misinterpretations
of you.

HAHAHAHA!

Androcles







.

Relevant Pages

  • Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
    ... If I am well informed, constant velocity movement causes time delation, ... Velocity and acceleration are two completely different things, ... corner his idiot theory of Special Relativity in less than twenty lines ... Consider two clocks K and K' that are in orbit around some heavy body ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
    ... |> If I am well informed, constant velocity movement causes time delation, ... Acceleration causes also time ... | fact that special relativity can handle accelerated motion perfectly. ... |> Consider two clocks K and K' that are in orbit around some heavy body ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
    ... fact that special relativity can handle accelerated motion perfectly. ... Velocity and acceleration are two completely different things, ... I have read many textbooks on Special and General Relativity, ... Consider two clocks K and K' that are in orbit around some heavy body ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
    ... fact that special relativity can handle accelerated motion perfectly. ... Velocity and acceleration are two completely different things, ... I have read many textbooks on Special and General Relativity, ... Consider two clocks K and K' that are in orbit around some heavy body ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
    ... fact that special relativity can handle accelerated motion perfectly. ... Velocity and acceleration are two completely different things, ... I have read many textbooks on Special and General Relativity, ... Consider two clocks K and K' that are in orbit around some heavy body ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading