Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:22:44 GMT
jan.verheul@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
If I am well informed, constant velocity movement causes time delation,
according to Special Relativity.
Then you are not "well informed". First, your use of the word "causes" is a PUN on the word. Second, in SR, time dilation is a purely geometrical effect due to the way time intervals are projected onto different coordinates.
Acceleration causes also time
dilation, according to General Relativity.
That is just plain false. Indeed, GR satisfies the "clock hypothesis" which states that the tick rate of an ideal clock is unaffected by its proper acceleration. This has been _measured_ to be true for muons in a storage ring accelerated with 10^18 gee [see Bailey et al referenced in the FAQ].
> [... lots of nonsense based on these and other mistakes]
If you want to "prove" that SR is "dead", then you must use the ACTUAL theory in your analysis, and not your personal MISTAKES about it. All the confusions and silliness you mention are due to your personal MISTAKES, and are unrelated to the ACTUAL theory. <shrug>
Tom Roberts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- References:
- Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: jan . verheul
- Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Prev by Date: Re: Confusion redux: "Centrifugal Force"
- Next by Date: Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
- Previous by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Next by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
