Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Nov 2006 14:46:46 -0800
jan.verheul@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
Be prepared for the fourth proof of invalidity of SR. This time it will
be a well documented experiment with two atomic clocks in two
airoplanes...
Just because you know computer science does not mean you know physics.
The experimental result you are talking about [or will shortly talk
about] doesn't disprove SR because SR doesn't handle gravity.
Leave physics alone, you are obviously uneducated in the field.
To be continued...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- References:
- Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- From: jan . verheul
- Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Prev by Date: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Next by Date: Speciial Relativity was stillborn (proof #1 and #2) + coping with grief.. hahaha!
- Previous by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Next by thread: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|