Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sQY7h.192900$uB4.2970693@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<jan.verheul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1163938914.981694.28270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[snip]

You know what?
To convince me that it would be worth the trouble for me to
show you the other viewpoint, you can start making the
following little exercises:

E1: Show which formula you use for the Doppler effect, and
-in detail- how you conclude that the "effect of an outgoing
and incoming trip cancel out".

E2: Show how the integral of phase1
T sqrt( 1 - v^2/c^2 )
is calculated from int{ sqrt( 1 - [v(t)/c]^2 ) dt }
By the way, you overlooked a rather obvious typo in my post.
I have corrected it.

E3: Show how the integral of phase2
c / a argsinh( a A/c )
is calculated from int{ sqrt( 1 - [v(t)/c]^2 ) dt }

E4: You will find the derivation of the expression
int{ sqrt( 1 - [v(t')/c]^2 ) ( 1+a x'(t') ) dt' }
on
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/dc8ebabd9e0c1500
and on (for instance):
http://www.geocities.com/slithytove5/AccelClocks.htm
See equation (18). Also explain the difference between the
meanings of my variables and the variables of the article.
Tell me which part of the derivation is not based on S.R and
therefore 'concoctive'.

Dirk Vdm

Nah... it's not going to happen.

Dirk Vdm


.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast