Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:24:41 GMT
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1164069248.884528.22660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
.
I hope you colleagues are
watching this thread , you should get treatment at an insane asylum.
His colleagues?
You mean the ones who know him as Jaco Verheij?
Dirk Vdm
So, he's not dr. Jan Verheul , he's some bum named Jaco Verheij? Has he
been on this forum before? How have you unmasked him?
ISP check and 1 google search.
He posted from where he's currently attending a symposium.
His name is on the list of attendees:
http://www.upsite.com/symposium/UserDelegates.html
.... and then a bit of verification to make sure there's
not a few hundred more occurences of "Jan Verheul"
and/or "Jaco Verheij".
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- References:
- Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- From: jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- From: jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- From: jan . verheul
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Special Relativity is Dead! (second proof)
- Prev by Date: Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Third Proof)
- Next by Date: Re: symmetric twins paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- Next by thread: Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- Index(es):