Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: "Norman Bates" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:29:28 +0200
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164152479.837227.176960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tweedledum and Tweedledee.
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164150470.848980.60810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164149457.057591.20000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164148361.712141.318760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageThe same way I got the "pencils" :-)
news:1164147601.583567.277130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164146928.792911.212450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164145035.714037.52640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164069248.884528.22660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
.
I hope you colleagues are
watching this thread , you should get treatment at
an insane asylum.
His colleagues?
You mean the ones who know him as Jaco Verheij?
Dirk Vdm
So, he's not dr. Jan Verheul , he's some bum named
Jaco Verheij? Has he
been on this forum before? How have you unmasked him?
ISP check and 1 google search.
He posted from where he's currently attending a
symposium.
His name is on the list of attendees:
http://www.upsite.com/symposium/UserDelegates.html
... and then a bit of verification to make sure there's
not a few hundred more occurences of "Jan Verheul"
and/or "Jaco Verheij".
Dirk Vdm
Ah, the dirty piece of ***. So, he got an email address
jan.verheul@.... just to :
-masquarade as a PhD
-smear another person
Jaco, you are a piece of ***.
bwoh... or just a nick name for Usenet - probably pretty
harmless I guess.
I assume you're not a pencil manufacturer either? ;-)
Dirk Vdm
Yes, I am. Very sharp ones :-)
Ai! with a Ph.D?
Dirk Vdm
No, DN (Doktor Nauka)
Wow, an Oregonian DN. How did you get *that*?
Very, very, very sharp pencils?
Dirk Vdm
Hey. how about we go and hassle prfessor emeitus Thim Hartwig,
member
of the National Philosophy Alliance
http://www.mrelativity.net/Visitor%20Forum/VForum/00000014.htm
who claims that Einstein got the Doppler effect wrong, he even
wrote
some papers on his experiments about this:
http://www.ime.jku.at/
(go to Staff,/Hartwig Thim
I'll go to Marlene Schmidthaler first :-)
.../Publications, see the bottom of the list). A
crank from the academia, should be a fun one to rattle :-)
Aaarg - another "Diplom Ingenieur degree in Electrical Engineering
from Technical University of Vienna, Austria". Good grief, where
*do* they all come from?
hm... it seems that the sclerosis began to manifest itself at the
age of 68, the average NPA members age.
Nasty.
Dirk Vdm
Did you look at his papers, they are pure ***, it is amazing he got
them published even in Galilean Electrodynamics.
I started at the end of course :-)
Dirk Vdm
He was pretty normal indeed until the age of 68 when daementia set in.
Then, he discovered relativity.
With his engineering education the unease must have been lurking
but slumbering during his entire career - but pretty harmless.
It wasn't until he got retired that he started to put some time in it.
But by then it was probably too late - alas :-(
Dirk VdM
some psychiatrist would have a ball studying these "specimens"....I met
him...and Wintterberg (and others). Come to think of it, they have
something in common: they raise their voices and start foaming when
they talk about relativity.
.
- References:
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- Prev by Date: Re: Black hole questions
- Next by Date: Re: Centrifugal force is not a ficticious force
- Previous by thread: Re: Jan Verheul - cretin
- Next by thread: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
- Index(es):
Loading