Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)




Tom Roberts wrote:
pmb61@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]

I don't remember if you are one of the people who believes in Dayton
Miller's anomalous "ether drift" result. But in any case I have written
an article showing that his data have no signal and are consistent with SR:
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608238

Also the article you posted does not present a single formula used to
obtain the results that attempt to rebut Miller's conclusions.

Thus, the analysis of the article is not easily reproducible.

Mike





I've been invited to Case (where Miller worked) to present a colloquium
on this. I am about to present a colloquium at Fermilab on experimental
tests of SR, and debunking Miller's result will be a part of it.


Tom Roberts

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
    ... Tom Roberts wrote: ... I don't remember if you are one of the people who believes in Dayton ... Miller's anomalous "ether drift" result. ... I've been invited to Case to present a colloquium ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
    ... I don't remember if you are one of the people who believes in Dayton Miller's anomalous "ether drift" result. ... I am about to present a colloquium at Fermilab on experimental tests of SR, and debunking Miller's result will be a part of it. ... Tom Roberts ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
    ... I don't remember if you are one of the people who believes in Dayton ... Miller's anomalous "ether drift" result. ... I've been invited to Case to present a colloquium ... That guy calls himself Pete Brown, hence the confusion ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
    ... Tom Roberts wrote: ... I don't remember if you are one of the people who believes in Dayton ... Miller's anomalous "ether drift" result. ... Pete (aka Pmb) ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)