Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2006 12:53:05 -0800
John Baez wrote:
In article <O2d9h.1073$bz5.653@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Sorcerer <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For example, John Baez is a "moderator" that will automatically
reject any post of mine because he is the object of my attack
and censorship is his only form of defence.
I haven't been a moderator since 2003. Maybe it's time to
make up something new to complain about?
Hi Dr.John Baez, I'm lurkin this thread too.
To your question, I figure a mathematical physicist
includes all universes then uses exclusion.
While a physical mathematician excludes all universes
then uses inclusion. For example, only certain metrics
hold using AE's Guv=Tuv, I think that's an inclusion,
albiet questionable in the long term.
BTW, I'm thinking of resettling GR onto a base where
LIGO and GP-b is null, within GR Principles, do ya
think it's to soon?
Ken
.
- References:
- Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- From: pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- From: pmb61
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- From: John Baez
- Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- Prev by Date: Re: symmetric twins paradox
- Next by Date: Re: Black hole questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- Next by thread: Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
- Index(es):