Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: "Mike" <eleatis@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2006 19:27:18 -0800
JanPB wrote:
[snip]
So if you don't like the WORD "fictitious" - fine. Point is division
into two types of forces ("real" and "fictitious" according to the
ingrained terminology) does make sense. Whether such distinction is
useful and/or confusing is another question but it definitely has its
place in physics.
"Ficticous" has no place in physics. As I said, both of my main
graduate mechanics/dynamics texts, do not use this label. It is only
very recent that some people insist on that label, including some cult
relativists.
Force is just a definition. How can a definition be "real" or
"ficticious"? It is beyond comprehension.
I think that poeple that made the mistake of calling some inetial
forces fictisious did have in mind that force has a real existence.
They created more confusion than intended to solve.
By the way, I hope you know that Newton in Principia clarifies that
force is a mathematical concept right after he states the laws.
Mike
--
Jan Bielawski
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: JanPB
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- References:
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: ftl
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: rstn
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Mike
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: JanPB
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Next by Date: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Next by thread: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|