Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)


<jan.verheul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1164697377.140843.13490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk vd Moortel,

If your mathematical capabilities are as good as your detective
capabilities, you cannot even add two integers. You are making a fool
of yourself by looking for a "real" identity whereas I have given my
real name, and an email address of one of my spam boxes. There is no
reason to doubt this and the "forensic" work that is presented to back
the claim that I am "Jaco Verheij" is laughable. Shall I send you my
PhD thesis? It is full of math, about formal languages, and I am quite
sure that you will be drowned in it before you reach page 5.

Questioning a scientific degree

I never questioned your degree.
That's strawman #1.

of someone who claims to have one is
cheap, especially if you don't have one yourself. Are you aware of the
fact that unrightfully using scientific degrees/titles is an offense?
It is at least in decent countries, like my country, and there is no
single hair on my head that would contemplate claiming a scientific
degrees if I would not have them.

I have noticed that your postings all receive a five star rating by one
person, even if the contents are just chatting with no scientific
relevance (watch the postings immediately preceding this posting). You
seem to have a silent admirer. Who is doing this? Your wife? Or are you
doing it yourself via a for that purpose created alias?

No idea - I never use google groups.
That's strawman #2.


By the way: I like the "Permutation Generator" that you generously made
available to the world on your home page
(users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/index.html). Especially the possibilty
to produce "shuffled output" is very useful in my eyes ;-)

Someone asked by email for that possibility.
That's strawman #3.

I saw that
you have just released version 2.5.

Anytime I get an email with a request, I try to satisfy it.

Obviously you are constantly
refining your program. How many hours did you work on it last week? I
am really impressed! How did you solve the problem algorithmically?
Recursively, or is that a new word for you? It must have been a
formidable achievement in your eyes, if you present it to the world.
(since you are playing with toys, we can at least guess your age.)

The "Proof by Construction" geometrical problem is a boring triviality.
Where is the error? Well, your drawing is wrong.

Indeed, that's the idea.
That's strawman #4.

The congruent triangle
should be drawn with point D left of BG instead of right of BG. This is
evident from the drawing, since CF and DF should have equal length. I
saw it in less than a minute. In a "right" drawing angle DBG counts
negative in the sum, and therefore the sum is less than 90 degrees.
"Very interesting".

Regards, Jan alias "Jaco".

Does your religious fanatism allow you to lie about your identity?
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ReligionRelativity.html

Dirk Vdm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
    ... If your mathematical capabilities are as good as your detective ... I have noticed that your postings all receive a five star rating by one ... Well, your drawing is wrong. ... made a fool out of you, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
    ... If your mathematical capabilities are as good as your detective ... I have noticed that your postings all receive a five star rating by one ... Well, your drawing is wrong. ... negative in the sum, and therefore the sum is less than 90 degrees. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading