sci.physics.relativity
- johnreed Catch 22,
johnlawrencereedjr
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light",
Teg
- Re: NEWTON WRONG IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD,
Sorcerer
- 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?,
Peter Christensen
- Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Juan R.
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Surfer
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
shuba
- wishing happy and prosperous new year 2007 to everybody,
himalayahill@xxxxxxxx
- For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Pmb
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Pmb
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Pmb
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity,
schoenfeld . one
- Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?,
socratus
- Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY: VIOLATIONS AND AXIOMS,
shuba
- Re: "it is the centrifugal stupid",
PD
- lagrangian,
Ass. Cult. Micene
- Is this serious?,
karandash2000
- Re: Is this serious?,
dlzc
- Re: Is this serious?,
sal
- Re: Is this serious?,
dlzc
- Re: Is this serious?,
sal
- Re: Is this serious?,
pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Todd
- Re: Is this serious?,
sal
- Re: Is this serious?,
Todd
- Re: Is this serious?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Is this serious?,
xxein
- Re: Is this serious?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is this serious?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
sal
- Re: Is this serious?,
pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Is this serious?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Is this serious?,
bergeron
- THE GENESIS. ( 6),
socratus
- AE, luce a non lucente,
Peri of Pera
- Re: what is an alien reproduction vehicle?,
xxein
- "The Right Angle Lever Paradox",
Teg
- Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us,
himalayahill@xxxxxxxx
- Graviational potential inside the Earth,
karandash2000
- Re: THE FORGOTTEN FACET OF EINSTEIN'S THEORY,
Koobee Wublee
- "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?",
Teg
- ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.,
Stamenin
- Re: BAD NEWS FOR EINSTEIN'S CRIMINALS,
Koobee Wublee
- electric and magnetic fields as spacetime distortions?,
rim317-ava@xxxxxxxxxxx
- simultaneity exists,
Click here to continue
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Click here to continue
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Barry
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sylvia Else
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Spirit of Truth
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: simultaneity exists,
karandash2000
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Koobee Wublee
Re: simultaneity exists,
Spirit of Truth
THE GENESIS. (5).,
socratus
Mass density,
Pmb
Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
bergeron
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
snowdonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
snowdonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
snowdonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
sal
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
karandash2000
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
bergeron
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Tom Roberts
Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Click here to continue
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Click here to continue
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
bergeron
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
bergeron
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
bergeron
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
bergeron
- Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234,
sal
Lie Dragging,
Pmb
Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Vert
Special Relativity - General Consequences,
Pmb
Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences,
Tom Roberts
Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences,
Spirit of Truth
Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences,
Spirit of Truth
Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Sorcerer
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pax
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
sal
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Your message will appear in sci.physics.relativity in a moment
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Barry
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Barry
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Barry
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Pmb
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Barry
- Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!,
Autymn D. C.
Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
karandash2000
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
karandash2000
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Surfer
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
JanPB
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
karandash2000
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
shuba
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
JanPB
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
JanPB
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
JanPB
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
JanPB
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Surfer
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Surfer
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
JanPB
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Surfer
- Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Koobee Wublee
huge relativity paradox, again,
My Account
Gravity waves and superposition principle,
spawn_ce
Re: void or transparent objects?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: anty alchemstry forces,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Message not available
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Message not available
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: 2+2=5,
Sylvia Else
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Sylvia Else
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Sylvia Else
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
kenseto
- Re: 2+2=5,
Sylvia Else
- Re: 2+2=5,
kenseto
- Re: 2+2=5,
Sylvia Else
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: 2+2=5,
JanPB
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
JanPB
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
JanPB
- Re: 2+2=5,
osso
- Re: 2+2=5,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: 2+2=5,
JanPB
A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
osso
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Surfer
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Barry
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity,
Sorcerer
The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN,
vlcek
"instant" of the Big-Bang,
Pmb
Relation between electron movement and power factor,
neohunts
Occums razor,
Dac
Simultaneous events experiment,
David
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe",
Teg
Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time(2),
Zinc Potterman
Re: lost civilizations did relativity,
LuckyE
Re: Einstein was a wise old elf (Speed of Gravity),
Koobee Wublee
What centrifugal force, Henri?,
Sorcerer
Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?,
Sorcerer
Message not available
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Sorcerer
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Tom Roberts
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Jerry
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Jerry
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
pmb
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Tom Roberts
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Tom Roberts
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Tom Roberts
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Pmb
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Tom Roberts
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
harry
- Message not available
- Message not available
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Eric Gisse
"And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
fitz
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
fitz
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
fitz
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
fitz
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
fitz
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Sue...
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Sorcerer
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Pax
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
Pax
- "Universities Asleep at the Switch",
Sue...
- Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.,
JanPB
Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time,
Zinc Potterman
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
- Message not available
- Message not available
"Retic Postings and SPAM",
Teg
Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?,
Chris
Re: The Problems of SR/GR,
Koobee Wublee
cathegories of dimensions,
gallasr
novel multi-dimensional theory,
xaos
Re: BEYOND EINSTEIN: NEWTON,
Koobee Wublee
the edge of the universe,
xaos
Perihelion of Mercury question,
David
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Igor
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
bill . m . thomas
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
bill . m . thomas
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
bill . m . thomas
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
bill . m . thomas
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
bill . m . thomas
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Igor
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
vanep
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Tom Roberts
Message not availableRe: Perihelion of Mercury question,
jcon
Message not availableRe: Perihelion of Mercury question,
jcon
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Igor
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
jcon
Message not availableRe: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Message not availableRe: Perihelion of Mercury question,
jcon
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
schoenfeld . one
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Randy Poe
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
- Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Sorcerer
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Nicolaas Vroom
Sagnac Effect question,
David
Crank Alert [einsteinhoax.com] - Dec 18, 2006 10:08 EST,
crank_hunter
Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST,
crank_hunter
Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Sue...
Again and again about the result of MMX,
vps137
Crank Alert - [Tom Roberts] under watch,
crank_hunter
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
JanPB
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pmb
- Message not available
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
- Message not available
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pmb
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pmb
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
- Message not available
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
JanPB
- Message not available
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
JanPB
- Message not available
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
JanPB
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
jamesahart79
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Barry
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pmb
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
crank_hunter
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
stephen
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
stephen
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Mike
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Mike
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Mike
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Tom Roberts
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
crank_hunter
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Pax
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Daryl McCullough
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Mike
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
PD
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons,
Sorcerer