sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• johnreed Catch 22
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Vert
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Teg
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: NEWTON WRONG IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Surfer
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Sorcerer
• Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: AE, luce a non lucente
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• wishing happy and prosperous new year 2007 to everybody
  • From: himalayahill@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: AE, luce a non lucente
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: xxein
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Todd
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: sal
• Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: what is an alien reproduction vehicle?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Todd
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: lagrangian
  • From: Ass. Cult. Micene
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: pmb
• Re: AE, luce a non lucente
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY: VIOLATIONS AND AXIOMS
  • From: shuba
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: lagrangian
  • From: sal
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "it is the centrifugal stupid"
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: sal
• lagrangian
  • From: Ass. Cult. Micene
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: dlzc
• Is this serious?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• THE GENESIS. ( 6)
  • From: socratus
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: bergeron
• Re: AE, luce a non lucente
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• AE, luce a non lucente
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Surfer
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: brad
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: xxein
• Re: what is an alien reproduction vehicle?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Communists started the Einstein hoax, for the same reasons they start
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: shuba
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Teg
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from non-crank site
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from non-crank site
  • From: shuba
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us
  • From: himalayahill@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: Pmb
• Graviational potential inside the Earth
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE FORGOTTEN FACET OF EINSTEIN'S THEORY
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Teg
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: sal
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Barry
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: electric and magnetic fields as spacetime distortions?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electric and magnetic fields as spacetime distortions?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: BAD NEWS FOR EINSTEIN'S CRIMINALS
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: electric and magnetic fields as spacetime distortions?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: Mike
• electric and magnetic fields as spacetime distortions?
  • From: rim317-ava@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Barry
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: Barry
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Your message will appear in sci.physics.relativity in a moment
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Click here to continue
• simultaneity exists
  • From: Click here to continue
• THE GENESIS. (5).
  • From: socratus
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Click here to continue
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Click here to continue
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Teg
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: snowdonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Todd
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: snowdonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Mass density
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: snowdonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Mike
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: pmb
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Todd
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: sal
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pax
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Dac
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Relativistic Mass - Part 1,865,234
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lie Dragging
  • From: sal
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pax
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Lie Dragging
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Vert
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: xxein
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: Barry
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: My Account
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: My Account
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: karandash2000
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Teg
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: My Account
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: My Account
• Special Relativity - General Consequences
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Merry Christmas Everyone!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: karandash2000
• Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: xxein
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: Barry
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: xxein
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravity waves and superposition principle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• huge relativity paradox, again
  • From: My Account
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Gravity waves and superposition principle
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Mike
• Gravity waves and superposition principle
  • From: spawn_ce
• Gravity waves and superposition principle
  • From: spawn_ce
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: void or transparent objects?
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: void or transparent objects?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: anty alchemstry forces
  • From: xxein
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: osso
• Re: A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: anty alchemstry forces
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: 2+2=5
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: xxein
• Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Barry
• A Stochastic Approach to Gravity
  • From: Barry
• The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• "instant" of the Big-Bang
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relation between electron movement and power factor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relation between electron movement and power factor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Relation between electron movement and power factor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relation between electron movement and power factor
  • From: sal
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Occums razor
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Relation between electron movement and power factor
  • From: neohunts
• Occums razor
  • From: Dac
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: PD
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: jcon
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Simultaneous events experiment
  • From: David
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Mike
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Mike
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Teg
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: harry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: harry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: harry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: harry
• Re: lost civilizations did relativity
  • From: ppdelang
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: lost civilizations did relativity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: lost civilizations did relativity
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time(2)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Mike
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time(2)
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: Communists started the Einstein hoax, for the same reasons they start
  • From: Russell
• Re: Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time(2)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: lost civilizations did relativity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time(2)
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: lost civilizations did relativity
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Einstein was a wise old elf (Speed of Gravity)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Einstein was a wise old elf (Speed of Gravity)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: pmb
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: jcon
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Igor
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: pmb
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: jcon
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: bill . m . thomas
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Pax
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Pax
• Re: Communists started the Einstein hoax, for the same reasons they start
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Communists started the Einstein hoax, for the same reasons they start
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Communists started the Einstein hoax, for the same reasons they start
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: PD
• Re: What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: DANGEROUS Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: jcon
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: jcon
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• What centrifugal force, Henri?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Mike
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: "Universities Asleep at the Switch"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: "Universities Asleep at the Switch"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Universities Asleep at the Switch"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Communists started the Einstein hoax, for the same reasons they start
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: cathegories of dimensions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: fitz
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: fitz
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: stephen
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: fitz
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: fitz
• Re: the edge of the universe
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: the edge of the universe
  • From: fitz
• Re: "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• "And so it could be with fundamental physics. Underneath the laws of physics as we know them today it could be that there lies a very simple program from which all the known laws--and ultimately all the complexity we see in the universe--emerges.
  • From: fitz
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: BEYOND EINSTEIN: NEWTON
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: bill . m . thomas
• Re: Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: jcon
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: stephen
• Hartle - Lagrangian and proper time
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: stephen
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: vanep
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: bill . m . thomas
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: vanep
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: PD
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Barry
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Teg
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: bill . m . thomas
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: bill . m . thomas
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The Problems of SR/GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• cathegories of dimensions
  • From: gallasr
• Re: BEYOND EINSTEIN: NEWTON
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: BEYOND EINSTEIN: NEWTON
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: David
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Pmb
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: xaos
• Re: novel multi-dimensional theory
  • From: xaos
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: xaos
• novel multi-dimensional theory
  • From: xaos
• Re: BEYOND EINSTEIN: NEWTON
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: BEYOND EINSTEIN: NEWTON
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• the edge of the universe
  • From: xaos
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Crank Alert - [Tom Roberts] under watch
  • From: xaos
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Crank Alert - [Tom Roberts] under watch
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Crank Alert [einsteinhoax.com] - Dec 18, 2006 10:08 EST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Sagnac Effect question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: David
• Sagnac Effect question
  • From: David
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: harry
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Crank Alert [einsteinhoax.com] - Dec 18, 2006 10:08 EST
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Todd
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: crank_hunter
• Crank Alert [Tom Roberts] - Dec 18, 2006, 8:49 EST
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: harry
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: David
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: harry
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: sal
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: David
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: David
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Pmb
• Re: big bang paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: sal
• Re: Crank Alert - [Tom Roberts] under watch
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: In other prosepctives
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pax
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Crank Alert - [Tom Roberts] under watch
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: kenseto
• Crank Alert - [Tom Roberts] under watch
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: big bang paradox
  • From: Pax
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: big bang paradox
  • From: Pax
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: In other prosepctives
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: big bang paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Life: In other prosepctives
  • From: Sarah Garner
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: big bang paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Communists started the Einstein hoax, for the same reasons they start
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Religious_Types are afraid of death ( and life ).
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Simple question about light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Pmb
• Simple question about light
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Pax
• Re: C = 0
  • From: ExtrêmeAchillès
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Pax
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• THE GENESIS. (4).
  • From: socratus
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: sal
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: sal
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: moon geodesics
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Brian McMullen
• geodesic deviation confusion
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Q:DIRAC MATRICES
  • From: Alergoman
• C = 0
  • From: ExtrêmeAchillès
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gisse unplonked
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Igor
• "Gravity"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Piezo-electric GR and QFT.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Crank Alert [PD] in action - Dec 16, 2006 9:51 EST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why does light travel so slowly?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why does light travel so slowly?
  • From: Antonio Dell'elce
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Raghar
• Crank Alert [PD] in action - Dec 16, 2006 9:51 EST
  • From: crank_hunter
•      The Einstein Hoax The Goyims Strike Back  
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Q:DIRAC MATRICES
  • From: Todd
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Why does light travel so slowly?
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: PD
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: PD
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: constrictor
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: constrictor
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: PD
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• moron erik gisse
  • From: doc
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: doc
• Re: Why Does Light Travel So Fast???
  • From: doc
• Re: what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• the eye of a vulture
  • From: doc
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: doc
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• what the heck is a fabric of space
  • From: doc
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: crepes
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Q:DIRAC MATRICES
  • From: Alergoman
• DIRAC MATRICES, someone help!
  • From: Alergoman
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Crank Alert [socratus] - Dec 15 11:41 EST
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Todd
• Re: Crank Alert - dec 14, 2006 16:27 EST
  • From: Igor
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Igor
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: oriel36
• An Interesting Occurrence in Circular Motion
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Crank Alert [socratus] - Dec 15 11:41 EST
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Mike
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Mike
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: karandash2000
• THE GENESIS. (3)
  • From: socratus
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Pax
• Re: The postulates of IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: harry
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Absolute space/relative space
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: harry
• Gisse unplonked
  • From: Sorcerer
• Gisse unplonked
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Russell
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Absolute space/relative space
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: sal
• An unholy trinity of MMX solutions
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What instruction does Einstein give?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Russell
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Crank Alert - dec 14, 2006 16:27 EST
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Brian McMullen
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Brian McMullen
• Re: Crank Alert - Dec 14 2006, 15:55 EST
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank Alert - Dec 14 2006, 15:55 EST
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: osso
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Russell
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Russell
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Russell
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Crank Alert - dec 14, 2006 16:27 EST
  • From: osso
• Re: Crank Alert - Dec 14 2006, 15:55 EST
  • From: Mike
• Re: Crank Alert - Dec 14 2006, 15:55 EST
  • From: osso
• Re: Crank Alert - dec 14, 2006 16:27 EST
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Mike
• fabric of space !!?
  • From: osso
• Crank Alert - dec 14, 2006 16:27 EST
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Crank Alert - Dec 14 2006, 15:55 EST
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Mike
• Re: 0⁰ - what do this represents in physics?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Russell
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Crank Alert - Dec 14 2006, 15:55 EST
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: jamesahart79
• Absolute space/relative space
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: 0⁰ - what do this represents in physics?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Todd
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Raghar
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: crank_hunter
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: jem
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: KO mafia ! Global Democracy ARTSENU & COLD FUSION = TRIVOLUZIONE W post opec
  • From: Pmb
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: sal
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: sal
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Todd
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: crepes
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: crepes
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: crepes
• Re: is science important?
  • From: crepes
• Re: 0⁰ - what do this represents in physics?
  • From: crepes
• Re: The inertial rocket
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• The inertial rocket
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE GENESIS.(2)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• THE GENESIS.(2)
  • From: socratus
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: crepes
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Tom Roberts
• The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Another classic by Eric Gisse
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: 0⁰ - what do this represents in physics?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: crepes
• Re: 0⁰ - what do this represents in physics?
  • From: crepes
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Todd
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Todd
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Todd
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is why the speed of light is maximum and constant.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Relativity contradiction - gurus please explain
  • From: David
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: sal -- Al Qaeda spy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: harry
• Re: This is why the speed of light is maximum and constant.
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• This is why the speed of light is maximum and constant.
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: 0⁰ - what do this represents in physics?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• An Idea for Quantum Gravity (Criticisms Welcome)
  • From: Brian McMullen
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity relations valid for all c
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: crepes
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: crepes
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: crepes
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: crepes
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: crepes
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: crepes
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• 0⁰ - what do this represents in physics?
  • From: Don Bretonne
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Don Bretonne
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Dubois
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Dubois
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Dubois
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: What instruction does Einstein give?
  • From: David
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What instruction does Einstein give?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics Christmas Carols!
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ENTROPY AND THE PERVERSE LOGIC OF POSTSCIENTISM
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Physics Christmas Carols!
  • From: moosemcwilliams
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: harry
• Re: ENTROPY AND THE PERVERSE LOGIC OF POSTSCIENTISM
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What instruction does Einstein give?
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: gashan1971
• Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What instruction does Einstein give?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: PD
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• THE GENESIS.( 1)
  • From: socratus
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: is science important?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: Pmb
• What instruction does Einstein give?
  • From: David
• Re: big bang paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: math inconsistency
  • From: karandash2000
• math inconsistency
  • From: Dubois
• Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: Dubois
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Pax
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• relativity relations valid for all c
  • From: Dubois
• Re: Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Dubois
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Dubois
• Re: is science important?
  • From: Dubois
• Re: is science important?
  • From: Dubois
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Dubois
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Pax
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Pax
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: is science important?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Raghar
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: jem
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Teg
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: harry
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: reinvention of the wheel
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: reinvention of the wheel
  • From: pareshkumar
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Chris
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: @ YouTube: How the "One God" thingy REALLY got started
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: sal -- Al Qaeda spy
  • From: sal
• Re: sal -- Al Qaeda spy
  • From: sal
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: @ YouTube: How the "One God" thingy REALLY got started
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Pax
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Robert
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Vert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Vert
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: sal -- Al Qaeda spy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Vert
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• sal -- Al Qaeda spy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Vert
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: everbody attention...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• The Substandard Paradigm: The Vacuum Energy Density Fiasco!
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Robert
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: shuba
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: everbody attention...
  • From: rukiye
• Re: Einstein never heard of Principia
  • From: Mike
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Einstein never heard of Principia
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein never heard of Principia
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: shuba
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How Does This Affect GR?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Todd
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Pax
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• The Substandard Paradigm: Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Robert
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Pax
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
  • From: Vert
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: shuba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE GENESIS.
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: THE GENESIS.
  • From: Sorcerer
• THE GENESIS.
  • From: socratus
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I merely removed quotes that I had added months ago.
  • From: Debra Logan
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Todd
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: is science important?
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: pmb
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: pmb
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• The Substandard Model: Quarks?
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Todd
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Todd
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: sal
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: N-body problem solved using Euler equation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The 2005 clown festival
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Help with math
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Help with math
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Charlie
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Russell
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The 2005 clown festival
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The 2005 clown festival
  • From: Russell
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The 2005 clown festival
  • From: Russell
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• everbody attention...
  • From: rukiye
• Re: everbody attention...
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• everbody attention...
  • From: rukiye
• everbody attention...
  • From: rukiye
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: The 2005 clown festival
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Addendum
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• The 2005 clown festival
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Addendum
  • From: jem
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Another rotating clock - please explain experiment
  • From: David
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: N-body problem solved using Euler equation
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: N-body problem solved using Euler equation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: ENTROPY AND THE PERVERSE LOGIC OF POSTSCIENTISM
  • From: Charlie
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• N-body problem solved using Euler equation
  • From: Mike
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ENERGY CRISIS AND THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Charlie
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Sylvia Else
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: shuba
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Howard
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Howard
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Addendum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Howard
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: new relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Addendum
  • From: Pax
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: light mirror paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: David
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Russell
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: reinvention of the wheel
  • From: harry
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: reinvention of the wheel
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sorcerer
• reinvention of the wheel
  • From: pareshkumar
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: Crazy noob question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: gravity A
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: fitz
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Pioneer Anomaly Anomalous No More.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Pioneer Anomaly Anomalous No More.
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Pioneer Anomaly Anomalous No More.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Raghar
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pax
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: constant motion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: constant motion
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: constant motion
  • From: ivan
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: doo
• Re: PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE
  • From: doo
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: constant motion
  • From: doo
• Re: constant motion
  • From: Randy Poe
• constant motion
  • From: ivan
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: alien reproduction vehicles and relativity
  • From: mangoa
• Re: how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Einstein's Relativity.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Rip
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: Alan Dillard
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: harry
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how technical is Einstein's book on relativity?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• On The Irrelevance Of The Absolute Rest Frame In Special Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: Pmb
• What makes certain people think that ....
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: alien reproduction vehicles and relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: badd_xi2
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Rip
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: randau
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: randau
• Re: PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: randau
• Re: Nomenclature and Terminology - Inertial movement
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Rip
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Russell
• Re: Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: chip
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: chip
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• alien reproduction vehicles and relativity
  • From: chip
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: chip
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: ur83iwo
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Russell
• Re: Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Nomenclature and Terminology - Inertial movement
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Russell
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Is Anything Truly Random
  • From: randau
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Igor
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: David
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Russell
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: vlcek
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Nomenclature and Terminology - Inertial movement
  • From: vlcek
• PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Proper Time For Uniformly Accelerated Observer
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Russell
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Russell
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: pmb
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Universal Relativity
  • From: mangoa
• Accelerated expansion and GR
  • From: Rip
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: rstn
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: speed of wavecrest
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Raghar
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Mike
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GR spacetime is Newton's absolute space
  • From: Mike
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Alex
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR spacetime is Newton's absolute space
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: gravity A
  • From: RMDumse
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Barry
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: independence of speed of light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: gravity A
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: ufo relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Ebut
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: jem
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: jem
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: jillbones
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: jillbones
• Re: Does the Second Law of Thermodynamics prove the existence of God?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: sal
• Re: Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Effective coupling structures
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Does the Second Law of Thermodynamics prove the existence of God?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• The de Broglie-Bohm-Vigier interpretation of quantum mechanics
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Todd
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• About the unsatisfactory foundations of the clasical mechanics, by Einstein.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR spacetime is Newton's absolute space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GR spacetime is Newton's absolute space
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: GR spacetime is Newton's absolute space
  • From: Sue...
• GR spacetime is Newton's absolute space
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: The Rubber Second Of Time
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Clocks in circular motion - math logic help please
  • From: David
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Does the Second Law of Thermodynamics prove the existence of God?
  • From: socratus
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: sal
• Re: Hi Folks, Pmb is back! :)
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: MMX and orbital geometry
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX and orbital geometry
  • From: Raghar
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Rubber Second Of Time
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: harry
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Ebyam
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Rubber Second Of Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Rubber Second Of Time
  • From: harry
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: lkoluk2003
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: Mike
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: rogtioko
• Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: rogtioko
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Rubber Second Of Time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: xxein
• What is wrong with this crackpot?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Igor
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: MMX and orbital geometry
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Igor
• Re: Crazy noob question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jem
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Liar Paradox - a modern example
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: vern
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Crazy noob question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: bill . m . thomas
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• The Rubber Second Of Time
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: harry
• Re: The Liar Paradox - a modern example
  • From: harry
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New Trends in Physics
  • From: vlcek
• Vlcek - EINSTEIN comparison
  • From: vlcek
• Vlcek - EINSTEIN comparison 2
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: JanPB
• Re: MMX and orbital geometry
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Crazy noob question
  • From: rjtucke
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: MMX and orbital geometry
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can electricity be wirelessly transmitted?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Newtonian Physics in Noninertial Frames
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Igor
• MMX and orbital geometry
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity vs velocity addition
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: harry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Norman Bates
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Gravity"
  • From: Ebyam
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: jem
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: harry
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead! (Final Proof)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: rogtioko
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: symmetric twins paradox
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: bz
• Re: Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Counterargument to the force of gravity
  • From: rogtioko
• Re: Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Counterargument to the theory of relativity
  • From: rogtioko
• Re: A Few Good Natural Philosophers
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Special Relativity is Dead (second proof)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Using the Sagnac Effect to measure Absolute Velocity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Black hole questions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to measure one-way light speed.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• New form for GR's grav'l red shift & a novel interpretation for underlying physics
  • From: stargene
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: When can we use special relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Interpreting the MMX null result
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Speed of Light
  • From: Sorcerer