Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity


"Pax" <SherriFWhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:LNXdh.8594$wc5.3632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Paradise_@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1165507340.701975.88880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[snip]

By the way, I found your initial post very interesting, and worth further consideration, especially since the claims re the
Lorentz transformation have always bothered me on a level I really can't articulate properly.

Perhaps you don't really understand what transformations
are supposed to do.

It seems logical to me that the transformation should only be illusory, not actual yet, from what I can tell, it is asserted as an
actual, physical transformation.

Yes, indeed... you have missed something somewhere.


Another of my main curiosities concerns the math: Why is it a given y' = y when, from what I can see, it shouldn't? It appears
that, since y' is also subjected to forward movement, it should transform as well, though not as markedly as x'.

It seems that you don't understand what these variables represent.
x' and y' are numbers.
Numbers are not subject to forward movement.
Do you know what x' and y' actually represent?

Dirk Vdm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A. SR-cult fraud and corruption
    ... > 'primed coordinate system, the moving system, is moving parallel to ... > simplified transformation as is the case of y' and z'. ... [snip idiotic crap] ... > Why on earth does he now want to discuss the 'inverse transformation? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A. SR-cult fraud and corruption
    ... > 'primed coordinate system, the moving system, is moving parallel to ... > simplified transformation as is the case of y' and z'. ... [snip idiotic crap] ... > Why on earth does he now want to discuss the 'inverse transformation? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: A. SR-cult fraud and corruption
    ... > 'primed coordinate system, the moving system, is moving parallel to ... > simplified transformation as is the case of y' and z'. ... [snip idiotic crap] ... > Why on earth does he now want to discuss the 'inverse transformation? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why is Linq slower?
    ... transformation, but still calls through to the IEnumerable ... Slight point of pedantry (okay, extreme point of pedantry) - because ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben
    ... problems in Specialk Relativiy, that I have been executing the Lorentz ... Transformation incorrectly. ... Lorentz Transformation? ... Dirk Vdm ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)