Re: big bang paradox
- From: "Pax" <SherriFWhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:30:43 GMT
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4%fhh.197696$4Z1.64445@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear wire:
"wire" <c56cf6h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166378709.917696.131450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
In my pet theory (which only I will pet), the CMBR
is "just inside" an event horizon, and our universe
is some other universe's black hole. Our universe
is contained by one higher, and ours contains one
(or more) lower (which may also be our "container"
universe). Fully formed "gravitationally bound"
structures and heavy elements could be allowed to
be detectable right up to the CMBR. My "only"
problem is having heavy elements << hydrogen...
you see too many movies
"eragon" today.
We invent this world with our imaginations. The trick is both to find the
treasure written there by our forebears, and to enhance it for our
progeny.
Well said! :)
"Never Ending Story"... they look like such big, strong hands don't they?
There are no gypsys anymore, to come to town, bringing songs and stories
from afar...
David A. Smith
Be well - Pax
.
- References:
- Re: big bang paradox
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: big bang paradox
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: big bang paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple question about light
- Next by Date: Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: big bang paradox
- Next by thread: Re: big bang paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|