Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 19 Dec 2006 14:49:04 -0800
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1166493808.385344.77910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:
For those whom do not understand what I mean when I say that objects
appear smaller as relative distance between an object and an observer
increases, I mean that if one holds up a ruler or meter stick and
measures the length of a distant object, with one eye (focused upon the
distant object, the object will measure smaller than when it is closer.
One - its simple geometry
I'm not sure how geometry actually EXPLAINS perspective effects.
Although one can utilise mathematics to reproduce the illusion of
perspective, such an illusory reproduction does not necessarily explain
why distant objects appear smaller. One can also exaggerate
perspective. From the perspective of God...there is no "perspective".
It seems to me that my explanation not only provides an actual
explanation, it is backed by evidence. The evidence is to be found in
the fact that objects (typically) become smaller when cooled. This is
due to the fact that the rate of time flow for a cooled object is
relatively decreased and the cooled object therefore expands at a
slower rate than objects which are hotter. Thus, a cooled object
appears to have become smaller.
Of course, whether the cooled object has truly become smaller or the
hotter object has actually become larger is determined by which of the
two have changed (relative to the boundary of the universe). If the
hotter object's temperature (and size) has not changed relative to the
boundary of the universe, then the cooled object's size has actually
decreased (relative to the boundary of the universe). And if the hotter
object's temperature and/or size increase as opposed to stay the same,
then it is the hotter object which has expanded relative to the
boundary of the universe.
Since the boundary of the universe expands, it's size must be
associated with a temperature. Of course, this temperature increase
must be a negative increase. In other words, the temperature of the
universe must be a negative absolute Kelvin temperature. To revise a
previous explanation, I believe the universe is comprised of a
neutronium condensate which has condensed to the planck scale where the
condensate's temperature is Absolute zero degrees Kelvin and as it
continues to implode it's temperature becomes increasingly negative
(and it would therefore have effectively converted to an
anti-neutronium condensate from the perspective of an observer
positioned outside the event horizon).
Two - quoting huge tracts of your own text to add a few lines is pretty
pointless as it makes it difficult to find what you have posted. Snip
and quote.
Hopefully, this helps?
--
You know you've arrived when you've annoyed the cranks! Crank Hater proves his
stupidity here!
http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.physics/msg/f9488b70976a3a4b?&hl=en
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- References:
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Pax
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Pax
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Pax
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Pax
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Pax
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Paradise_
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativists Conclusively Prove They Are a Bunch of Morons
- Next by Date: Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|